The fine comes on the heels of a long-awaited proposal by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish guidelines for the storage of toxic coal ash. Incredibly, there is no current government regulation of coal ash, despite the fact it contains dangerous heavy metals and carcinogens that can be hazardous to humans and wildlife.

“It is absolutely incredible that there is no real oversight for the storage and safe disposal of this toxic waste,” said Beasley Allen attorney Rhon Jones, head of the firm’s Environmental Law section. “Most of these retention ponds are not lined or reinforced, and it’s inevitable that potentially hazardous material will leak out. They just are not a long-term solution. It’s only a matter of time before the next disaster. These facilities are everywhere – Alabama, Tennessee. Communities are living under a cloud, uncertain of their safety.”

On May 4, the EPA proposed two different ideas to regulate coal ash storage under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The first would regulate coal ash as a “special waste” and would require the phasing out of wet storage at impoundment plants. The Kingston disaster occurred at a wet-storage facility, when the containment wall failed. Under this proposal, the wet waste would be moved to landfills. The second proposal would allow for on-site storage of coal ash, but containment ponds would be required to be lined to prevent any toxic materials from seeping into groundwater.

The EPA announcement comes after years of debate about the safety of coal ash storage and disposal, and it may still take as long as two years for any guideline or ruling to take effect.

TVA spokesman David Brouff issued a statement saying the company will not challenge the state fine, and that it was expected. He estimates that 60 percent of the spill has been removed, but that the total clean-up operation could take another three to four years.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA hit with $11.5 million fine as a result of Tennessee coal ash spill

Even Young has gotten sick. She was diagnosed with melanoma and two precancerous conditions in her breast and thyroid. She says dogs living in the area have died from cancer. She has since become an environmental activist, fighting for government regulations for plants that store coal waste in an effort to save others from getting sick. It’s an uphill battle.

Coal ash is listed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a non-hazardous material and thus is exempt from federal regulation. The December 2008 spill from a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal-firing plant in east Tennessee that dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic material onto a rural neighborhood and into the Emory River brought national attention to the safety of coal ash. Coal waste contains dangerous toxins and heavy metals that have been found to cause serious health problems, including cancer.

Following a year-long investigation into the safety and storage of coal ash at sites nationwide, the EPA proposed new guidelines for the plants. Despite nearly 35 meetings between representatives of coal ash industries and members of the White House Office of Information Regulatory Affairs, action has yet to be taken.

Meanwhile, the TVA’s three-year, $1 billion cleanup of the spilled coal ash in east Tennessee continues. That process includes shipping tons of the recovered coal ash across state lines to a landfill in Perry County, Alabama, a poor and predominantly black community. Despite outcries from residents concerned about their health, the shipments keep on coming.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Report shows coal ash makes people sick

Their complaints seem to have fallen on deaf ears as train car loads of coal ash continue to be shipped into Alabama. But Wathen is speaking out. His letter to the EPA documents serious environmental health threats at the Arrowhead Landfill. Here is what Wathen contends:

• Dangerously high arsenic levels have been found in what’s described as “stinking gray/tannish waste” being pumped nightly from the landfill. Wathen tested the leachate from an on-site pump and found levels of arsenic that was 80 greater than the U.S. safe drinking water standard and far higher than what is considered safe for aquatic life.
• The arsenic-tainted waste runs in the landfill’s roadside ditches at levels that have exceeded safe drinking water limits. This water leads to private land where farm animals drink from surface water.
• An excessive amount of wet material is being dumped into the landfill, threatening the protective liner.
• Contaminated coal ash is falling from overloaded, uncovered trucks and spilling along the road. This contaminates the road in which the trucks travel. Untreated water there currently in flows into the Tayloe Creek. Some worry that when the weather dries out, the residue could become airborne.
• When the train cars hauling coal ash to the landfill are washed off, the runoff is allowed to flow into Tayloe Creek’s drainage basin, raising the same concerns.

Source: The Institute for Southern Studies, Facing South

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Activist documents coal ash dangers in letter to EPA

Coal ash recovered from the Kingston spill is being shipped by train car to Arrowhead Landfill in Perry County, Ala. That deal is generating a handful of jobs and millions in storage fees for the chronically poor and predominantly black community. Despite the benefits, residents say the coal ash is stinking up their town. And they are worried about the toxins seeping into the ground and contaminating their water. Coal ash contains arsenic and carcinogenic heavy metals. So far residents’ concerns have fallen on deaf ears.

But not in south Alabama, where the coal ash effects have been trickling down. Runoff water from the Arrowhead Landfill was originally shipped to a water treatment plant in Marion, Ala., and discharged into a creek. After a community outcry, the Environmental Protection Agency recommended that the runoff be taken elsewhere.

The new location? Liquid Environmental Solutions, a wastewater processing plant in Mobile, Ala. The plant “properly accepted, tested and treated the non-hazardous Perry County landfill wastewater” just before it was routed through the Mobile Area Water and Sewer System and discharged into Mobile Bay, according to a statement by Liquid Environmental Solutions senior vice president Dana King. Recently, the company decided to stop accepting shipments of wastewater from the landfill after community members express concerns. Where will the coal ash runoff be shipped now? TVA spokeswoman Barbara Martocci said it is “something that will have to be worked out” by the companies involved.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Trickle-down effect causing problems for coal ash disposal

But before the citizens of Perry County could file their lawsuit, the owners of Arrowhead Landfill filed for bankruptcy, a move that stops the residents’ planned lawsuit in its tracks. No new litigation can be brought against entities in bankruptcy proceedings.

Perry-Uniontown Ventures I LLC (PUV), also known as Perry County Associates, the company that owns the landfill, filed the documents last week in Mobile. PUV claims it owes $3.9 million to Phillips & Jordan Inc., (P&J) $779,837 to the Perry County Commission, and $11,000 to the Alabama Department of Revenue. PUV claims P&J and Phill-Con Services have withheld money paid by the TVA.

An attorney for the residents says that while the planned litigation cannot go forward until the bankruptcy matter is cleared up, other options are being examined.

Beasley Allen attorney Rhon Jones, who represents residents of east Tennessee who have lost property in the TVA coal ash spill, told the Selma Times Journal that he is uncertain whether the landfill’s bankruptcy would have any effect on his clients’ cases.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Lawsuit to halt coal ash dumping held up by landfill’s bankruptcy

TVA has already said that the billion-dollar cleanup is being footed by customers through their utility bills. That hike is hidden by a recent drop in fuel costs that has helped keep customers’ bills somewhat steady. If and when fuel prices creep back up, customers will see the change. But if coal ash, which contains arsenic and carcinogenic heavy metals, is reclassified as hazardous, it could affect how the TVA continues the cleanup process. And that $1.1 billion price tag could leap even higher.

EPA spokeswoman Latisha Petteway says the agency is still mulling the decision on how to classify coal ash. Both Petteway and Barbara Martocci, spokeswoman for the TVA, declined to comment on how the EPA’s decision would affect the TVA’s cleanup. However, classifying the coal ash as hazardous would almost certainly affect how the waste is recycled. Byproducts from coal-firing plants are used to strengthen building products such as wallboard and cement, and are even used to break down soil and fertilize crops.

The TVA is the nation’s largest utility with nearly nine million customers in Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, North Carolina and Virginia.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Coal ash classification could affect TVA customers’ bills

“You might have seen my picture in the paper,” she smiles at the video camera. John L. Wathen, a.k.a. Hurricane Creekkeeper, is shooting the video to capture community reaction to local government’s decision to store toxic coal ash in the nearby Arrowhead Landfill. That coal ash is recovered from the Emory River where more than a billion gallons of the toxic material spilled in December 2008 from a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal-firing plant in east Tennessee.

As part of a years-long, billion-dollar cleanup of the area, the TVA is hauling truckloads of the recovered coal ash from the river to the landfill in Perry County, an impoverished and historically black community in rural Alabama.

Local government calls the deal a “boon to the community.” It is expected to bring more than $3 million in “host fees” plus generate a few dozen jobs. Locals worry that they will have to shoulder the burden while city and county officials rake in the benefits.

“Sometimes at night when I’m in my bed I have my window cracked a little bit for some fresh air to keep from running the fan. I pick up this odor,” Ms. Ruby says. “I really don’ t want to say what it smell like. Some kind of gas. And it’s a bad scent … It wakes me up and it gets all through my house.

“I am concerned about my health. I’m breathing this stuff.”

Ms. Ruby and her neighbors worry their concerns are falling on deaf ears. But they aren’t the only ones who fear their health is in jeopardy. The recovered coal ash from Tennessee is being dumped into the Arrowhead Landfill and combined with household garbage. The liquid that drains from that landfill, also known as leachate, is trucked to nearby Marion, where it is then dumped into an open sewer lagoon and combined with sewage.

“The stench is horrible,” Wathen points out in his video. “Citizens nearby both locations fear for their health and safety.”

Watch Ms. Ruby’s and residents’ reactions.

Click here to view the embedded video.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Perry County residents voice concerns about coal ash storage

TVA officials say the increased energy demand is a result of extreme cold weather throughout the Southeast. The increase will likely help pad the coffers of the TVA, which are stretched these days due to a billion-dollar cleanup of an east Tennessee community that was covered in toxic sludge after a coal ash impoundment pond breached at the TVA’s Kingston site.

The TVA also shelled out millions to buy up damaged property at the spill site and to help pay for city and county improvements and a public relations campaign to help improve the damaged area’s image. Another billion is being spent to upgrade its other facilities. The utility is also facing lawsuits from hundreds who lost property or suffered injury as a result of the coal ash spill.

The TVA is entering negotiations with insurance companies to cover the billion-dollar cost of the cleanup; however, for now, TVA’s customers are footing that bill.

Sources:
WBRC-TV
The Tennessean

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA enjoys record-breaking energy sales

The coal ash, a byproduct of fossil fuel plants, which for years farmers have used to fertilize their fields, is also used to strengthen concrete for roads and as filler for recreational fields. It’s a convenient way for coal-firing plants to rid themselves of tons of waste each year. But some fear that the material, especially when used on crops, could be hazardous to human health.

“Basically this is a leap into the unknown,” says Jeff rush, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, to the Associated Press. “This stuff has materials in it that we’re trying to prevent entering the environment from coal-fired power plants and then to turn around and smear it across ag lands raises some real questions.”

The safety of such byproducts was brought to light a year ago, after more than a billion gallons of coal ash from the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) plant in Kingston, Tenn., spilled from an impoundment pond and covered a nearby community. New testing revealed that coal ash, which was not classified as a hazardous material, contained dangerous toxins and heavy metals that could pose serious health problems for humans. Since then, the EPA has been inspecting coal ash sites across the country and is establishing guidelines for safe storage, expected to be unveiled early next year.

Despite the presence of dangerous toxins in coal ash, the EPA says scattering the material on crops is “safe in appropriate soil and hydrogeologic conditions.” But is it worth the risk? For a dozen years, Decatur Utilities in Alabama distributed waste in the form of sludge from its treatment plant to farmers as free fertilizer for their crops. While the EPA was aware that the waste in fertilizer could be dangerous to humans as early as 1979, it wasn’t until last year that the EPA realized that the fertilizer was actually being dumped onto crops. Decatur Utilities quickly halted the practice. This month, the agency announced it would test the blood of as many as 200 residents in Lawrence County for potential toxic chemicals.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › EPA says coal ash is safe to use as fertilizer on crops

Turner testified at a congressional hearing last week about the coal ash cleanup and storage. Also testifying was TVA CEO Tom Kilgore, who said the nation’s largest utility will spend about $1 billion to improve coal ash storage facilities and convert wet storage to dry storage, considered a safer alternative.

The TVA is already shelling about $1.2 billion to clean up the mess it left when its impoundment pond breached, a process estimated to take about three years to complete. It also gave more than $40 million to Roane County, Tenn., to pay for upgrades to the city’s utilities and roads as well as fund a massive public relations campaign aimed at improving the city’s image following the spill.

But not everyone is sharing Turner’s excitement about the presence of recovered coal ash in Perry County. Environmentalist groups are accusing the TVA of using the impoverished county as a dumping ground for its toxic waste. Residents are also concerned about the threat of toxins leaching through the soil and contaminating ground water. Their voices are muted by those in power, like Turner, who last week told the TVA, “I say thank you, and send us some more.”

Source: Knox News

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Turner calls coal ash storage a ‘godsend’

Last December, the lives of the residents of Kingston, Tenn., were changed forever when a coal ash impoundment pond breached, dumping 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material on to 300 acres of rural community. The sludge, piled as high as nine feet in some areas, toppled houses, damaged property, and contaminated nearby waterways. Homeowners were displaced, businesses were compromised, locals began suffering from respiratory problems and were testing positive for heavy metals in their blood.

Suddenly, the country took notice. Environmentalists argued that what had been dubbed as one of the largest environmental disasters of its kind in U.S. history could have been avoided had the federal government been regulating the storage of coal ash. Instead, those regulations were left up to local governments and facility owners, who wallowed in denial instead of dealing with the warning signs of possible storage pond failures.

Recent tests on coal ash show that the sludge contains dangerous toxins that have been linked to serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Yet, the material was never classified as a hazardous material, and thus never fell under federal regulations.

Since the coal ash spill last year, the Environmental Protection Agency has been inspecting coal storage sites throughout the country and offering recommendations. But where does that leave American citizens who live close to coal ash impoundment ponds, including residents who live in Perry County, which is now taking in coal ash recovered from the east Tennessee spill site?

Turner calls it a “godsend.” By storing the recovered coal ash, Perry County will reap millions of dollars in storage fees and about 50 new jobs have been created at the local landfill. A group of residents from Perry County beg to disagree. They have filed suit against the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) saying the EPA should not allow the landfill to receive any more coal ash because there are no set standards for the safe disposal of ash and the prevention of it leaching into waterways, and because gasses from the lagoons are causing respiratory problems for area residents.

The attorney representing the residents says his clients are ready to file a lawsuit against the owners of the landfill as well.

Sources:
The Birmingham News
Selma Times-Journal

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Perry County residents file lawsuit against ADEM

But sometimes materials that we think are safe for use are in fact harmful to humans. Consider this sad story now being played out in Lawrence County, Alabama.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced it will test the blood of as many as 200 residents in Lawrence County for potentially toxic chemicals – toxins that were scattered on fields by Decatur Utilities, a local wastewater plant.

For 12 years, Decatur Utilities distributed sludge from its treatment plant to farmers for free for use as fertilizer on their crops. More than 90 percent of the county – or about 5,000 acres of land – have been covered with the stuff. In 1979, 3M conducted tests and alerted the EPA of the possibility that the fertilizer was contaminated with PFCs, or perflourinated chemicals. It wasn’t until last year that the EPA learned that the potentially contaminated sludge was being dumped on to farmland. Once the connection was made, Decatur Utilities stopped giving away the sludge-fertilizer.

While studies have shown that there is danger of PFCs harming laboratory animals, the effect of PFCs on humans is unclear. The EPA has conducted tests of public water supplies and the Department of Agriculture has studied samples taken from cattle slaughtered near contaminated land. Both have determined that they were safe for human consumption. However, tests on cattle’s blood have levels of PFOS, a particularly toxic PFC, at levels as high as 500 times the EPA health advisory applicable to drinking water, according to the Decatur Daily.

Residents of Lawrence County who live near heavily contaminated fields or who drink from contaminated private wells will receive letters from the EPA soon offering the free blood tests.

Kind of makes you wonder what we will learn about coal ash byproducts, especially those used to fertilize farmland.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › EPA tests Lawrence County residents for potential toxic chemicals

Since the massive spill, called one of the largest environmental disasters in the country, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has been undergoing an expected three-year, $1 billion cleanup effort of the land. Part of that cleanup involves recovering the spilled ash from the Emory River and loading it on to train cars to be dumped in landfills in other states and counties. Alabama’s Perry County was the first recipient.

Perry County is predominantly black and home to some of Alabama’s poorest citizens. Many are fuming at the local government’s decision to store the coal ash there and worry that the toxic material may seep into the soil and contaminate ground water. Coal ash contains dangerous toxins that have been linked to serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological problems.

But proponents of the coal ash dumping plan say the benefits out weigh the risks. The county is reaping a $1.05 per ton fee on the storage, which amounts to more than $1 million for the area. Plus, more than 50 jobs have been generated in the community.

Despite the benefits, residents like Holmes say the landfill has changed the community she grew up in. “Everybody was happy and we looked out for each other as we still do,” she said, “but we never had nothing like this.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Resident upset about county’s decision to store recovered coal ash

But if Crossville Coal Company and Smith Mountain Solutions have their way and are allowed to reclaim a surface mine on top of Smith Mountain to store coal ash recovered from the east Tennessee site of a massive coal ash spill, the narrow roadway where the Nicholsons walk will become even more treacherous with heavy trucks carrying tons of coal ash.

Smith Mountain Solutions says it will make safety improvements to the road and enforce low speed limits with GPS tracking, which would ultimately be a benefit to residents in the area. But few locals find the promise reassuring. Their concerns go beyond traffic issues. They are worried about their property and their health.

Coal ash is not categorized a hazardous material and thus does not fall under federal regulations. Last year, when a coal ash impoundment pond at the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston, Tenn., site breached and sent a wave of toxic material onto a rural community, the government and environmental groups took a closer look at coal ash and realized just how dangerous the material can be.

Tests have determined that coal ash has become more and more toxic over the years, as technological advances have improved the quality of smoke that is released into the air. The coal ash left behind has been shown to contain toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few. As a result, the Environmental Protection Agency has been inspecting coal ash impoundments nationwide and is expected to provide guidelines by the end of the year.

Meanwhile, the TVA is undergoing a years-long, $1.2 billion cleanup effort at the site of the massive coal ash spill in east Tennessee. That cleanup includes removing the spilled coal ash and shipping it to other landfills for storage. One landfill that is currently receiving the reclaimed coal ash is in Alabama.

TVA is eyeing the Smith Mountain landfill as another storage site but residents are fighting the plan. Not only will the traffic along Smith Mountain Road be heavier, thanks to trucks hauling tons of recovered coal ash, but there is the threat of the coal ash leaching into the soil and contaminating the land and drinking water. And then there’s the risk of another breach like that in Kingston, which toppled houses, damaged property and displaced numerous residents.

Proponents of the Smith Mountain landfill plan say it would be a win-win for the community. Not only would it ensure improvements of Smith Mountain Road, it will create jobs and generate millions of dollars in fees for the community. The companies have also promised to ensure the safety of the landfill with synthetic liners to cut down on leaching.

But arguments for the landfill have fallen on deaf ears. “This has been sold to us as a win-win proposition, which it clearly is not unless you are one of a couple of groups,” says Smith Mountain resident Earl Tyler.

Source: Crossville Chronicle

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Smith Mountain residents fight coal ash landfill

Last January, just one month after a coal ash pond at the TVA’s Kingston, Tenn., plant broke, sending a wave of toxic sludge on to 300 acres of neighboring property and waterways, contaminated water accidentally leaked from the Widows Creek plant. The TVA recalculated that pond’s rating as “high hazard” and spent $2 million to upgrade the ponds. The nation’s largest utility vowed to convert the ponds from wet to dry storage, considered a safer storage alternative. And, as a precaution, TVA also is buying property adjacent to the coal ash ponds where the leak occurred, land that is also adjacent to McCraw’s farm, property that is also historically significant as the site of the Civil War’s Battle of Bridgeport.

“We definitely don’t want to sell, but it’s scary for us,” McCraw says. “We fought the federal government on this land in the Civil War. I hope it doesn’t come to that again.”

Six weeks ago McCraw talked with officials from TVA and told them he was not interested in selling his land. He says he hasn’t heard from the utility since. But he fears the fight isn’t over. If the TVA doesn’t buy his land, what threat are he and his property under? Could contaminated water leak into the ground again? Could another spill like the one in Kingston occur on his land?

“I don’t know if it is dangerous or not, but we’ve asked and asked both TVA or ADEM (Alabama Department of Environmental Management) to check to see if there is a problem,” McCraw said.

Meanwhile, others in the area are not taking any chances. Darren McCloud readily sold 66 acres of his land just north of the Widows Creek ash ponds this summer to the TVA, and used the money to build a new home six miles away.

Sources:
Times Free Press
Gadsden Times

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Families weigh decision to move away from TVA coal ash storage site

Toxic coal ash

“If coal ash poses an unacceptable level of risk, inconsistent state standards should be immediately replaced with national guidelines that would put the safety of the people in one community on the same level as families living in another,” said Rep. Artur Davis, D-Birmingham, in a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and circulated around the House of Representatives.

Coal ash is not considered a hazardous material, and thus does not fall under federal regulation. However, improvements in coal ash burning facilities over the decades have made the smoke released into the air much cleaner. Those toxins instead settle in the coal ash left behind. Tests show that coal ash can contain dangerous levels of arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium – toxins that have linked to serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. That toxic ash is stored in dry or wet landfills throughout the country.

A December 2008 coal ash impoundment breach at a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) plant brought the question of the safety of coal ash into the spotlight. Last year’s coal ash spill dumped more than a billion gallons of coal ash on to a neighboring community, knocking houses off their foundations, destroying property, and contaminating nearby waterways. Environmentalists called it the largest environmental disaster of its kind in U.S. history. The TVA began an estimated three-year, $1 billion cleanup of the area, which includes relocating the recovered coal ash to landfills in other counties and states. The first shipments of recovered coal ash have already been shipped by railcar to a landfill in Perry County, Alabama.

Storing the recovered coal ash in Perry County will generate about $3 million in storage fees and bring in about 30 jobs to the poverty-stricken, predominantly black county, which some local officials consider a boon. But people who live and work there say they fear they are sitting on a time bomb that could one day destroy their property and livelihoods.

Earlier this year, Davis met with residents of Perry County who voiced their concerns, asking if there are any guarantees that the dangerous toxins will leach into drinking water or create any health problems now or in the future. Davis’ letter to the EPA aims to address those concerns and move forward EPA efforts to establish federal safety standards that are balanced among all states.

Source: Selma Times Journal

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Rep. Davis fights for people of Perry County in coal ash debate

The county will reap about $8 million over three years from fees. The project will also help improve the mine where the coal ash will be stored and bring road improvements so that covered trucks can haul the coal ash up the mountain to the landfill. What could be wrong with such a plan?

Plenty, say residents who live near the landfill. “I’ve been here for about three years. It’s just a beautiful place. It’s waterfalls, ponds, nature,” says David Brundage, owner of Black Cat Lodge, a rehabilitation escape for people recovering from drug and alcohol addictions. “My concern is everything I’ve built, everything I have here is going to be gone.”

It’s a valid concern. People who lived in the east Tennessee community of Kingston know far too well what can happen in a worse-case scenario. Residents there lost homes and property when 1.1 billion gallons of toxic coal ash tumbled from an impoundment pond from the nearby Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal-burning site. The December 2008 tragedy is listed as the largest environmental disaster of its kind in U.S. history. In an effort to restore the land, TVA is undergoing a three-year, $1 billion cleanup of the land. As part of the cleanup, gallons of recovered coal ash are being shipped via train car to a landfill in Perry County, Alabama, for storage, a move that is winning more support from Perry County officials than from the residents who live there.

Once the Alabama landfill is filled to its brim, TVA officials plan to load up covered trucks and move the toxic coal ash to neighboring Cumberland County, atop Smith Mountain. Which begs the question: how do you define a good neighbor?

Source: News Channel 5

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Cumberland residents say ‘no;’ officials say ‘yes’ to coal ash

The river was originally closed for 30 days in early August, followed by another 30-day extension. Now the TVA says it needs more time to remove the coal ash that spilled into the Emory River. TVA officials and the Environmental Protection Agency will review the situation in early February and decide when the river can be reopened at that time.

Six days a week, as many as 110 railcars filled with coal ash recovered from the river are being transported to a landfill in Alabama for storage. Despite the constant effort, only about one-third of the coal ash has been removed from the Emory. Once the river has been cleared, crews will turn their focus to the coal ash piled on the land.

During the closure, no river traffic will be allowed in order to make room for huge hydraulic dredging equipment. Those who have a significant need for transportation around the closed portion of the Emory River may request access by contacting the TVA by phone at least five days in advance.

Sources:
Knox News
OakRidger.com

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Emory River to remain closed until February as cleanup continues

That spill, considered one of the largest environmental disasters in U.S. history, destroyed homes, damaged property, sickened residents, and left a deep scar on the county’s public image. Now that toxic material recovered from the river is shipping to the poor and predominantly black county in Alabama in epic speed.

TVA originally estimated that it would send about 85 railcar loads of coal ash per day from Kingston to Alabama. But now that number has increased to 110 railcar loads per day. The increase is credited to an increase in dredging operations at the Emory River. TVA officials say they hope to have the Emory clear of visible coal ash by spring 2010.

Once the Emory is cleared, however, the work will not be completed. Removing the remaining coal ash will take another two years or so. Even with a visibly clean palate, experts still have concerns about what the naked eye cannot see, such as the dangerous toxins from coal ash that can leach into the soil and ground water. Some of those toxins found in coal ash have been linked to serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. And may residents who lived in the area are already suffering ill effects from the spill.

Source: News Channel 5

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA transports recovered coal ash to Alabama landfill at epic speed

About 500 people have been working almost nonstop to fill Norfolk Southern train cars with recovered toxic sludge and transport them to a landfill in Alabama. Judging by the vast stretches of gray on the ground, the end is far from sight. But TVA officials vow they will restore the land to its previous condition. Still, residents are skeptical.

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few. Many residents in the area have complained of respiratory issues and heightened anxiety. Some, including a young child, have tested positive for heavy metal in their blood.

While removing the ash may make the land appear good as new, environmentalists fear that the damage is a deeper problem, that toxins have seeped into the ground and waterways, affecting wildlife and plant life, which ultimately will create more problems for those who go back to live on the land.

Source: KnoxNews

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Coal ash cleanup still months, years away from completion

Last fall, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal-firing plant in Kingston, Tenn., was far from the minds of Roane County residents. The community welcomed long-time rural residents, retirees and those with second homes that looked out on the Emory River and Watts Bar Lake, and offered pleasant fishing and water recreation. However, that all changed on December 22, 2008, when a coal ash impoundment pond at the TVA plant failed, sending more than a billion gallons of coal ash tumbling on to 300 acres of a nearby community. The wave of toxic material, piled as high as nine feet in some areas, knocked homes from their foundations, damaged property, and tainted the Emory and other waterways downstream.

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins including arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been associated with serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few. Several residents in the area have complained of respiratory problems and heightened anxiety following the spill. Some residents, including a young child, have tested positive for heavy metals in their blood.

The TVA is undergoing what is expected to be a near-$1 billion cleanup of the property it contaminated. That cleanup includes recovering the fallen ash and storing it in landfills in other states, including the Arrowhead Landfill in Uniontown, Ala., in Perry County.

The expensive cleanup did little to improve the TVA’s reputation on a national scale, and worse yet, the spill severely impacted the public image of the town it damaged. In an effort to right itself, the TVA announced last week that it would give Roane County $43 million for improvements. The first projects announced by county officials include doubling the size of Kingston’s wastewater treatment plant, converting an old theater to a regional arts education center, and paving the entrance to the county industrial park. The county’s plan also includes a pricey public relations campaign headed by a Tennessee firm.

Some environmentalists say covering the tainted land with new projects and improvements will only mask what’s really underneath, dangerous toxins now buried deep in the ground that can wreak havoc on plant life, wildlife and even human life.

And what about the thousands of tons of coal ash recovered from the spill site and transported across state lines to Perry County? Some say it is a blessing in disguise. Perry County is predominately black and has one of the highest poverty rates in the state. The storage agreement with the TVA will translate into 30 new jobs for local residents and more than $3 million for the impoverished county.

The Environmental Protection Agency is supporting the relocation of coal ash to Alabama, saying the Arrowhead site is the “Cadillac” of landfills, specially lined to prevent leaching into soil and groundwater and with strength to hold up over time.

But residents of Perry County remain skeptical. “Money isn’t worth everything,” resident Mary Gibson Holley told the New York Times earlier this month. “In the long run they ain’t looking about what this could do to the community if something goes wrong.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Toxic coal ash generates income, jobs – but at what price?

The coal ash originates from the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) plant in Kingston, Tenn. Last December, more than a billion gallons of sludge from a breached impoundment pond poured down on to a neighboring community. The toxic wave knocked houses from their foundations, destroyed property, and contaminated nearby waterways when it spilled into the Emory River and traveled downstream.

In the months since, property values plummeted and residents have reported respiratory problems and heightened anxiety. Some people, including a toddler, have tested positive for heavy metals in their bloodstream. Coal ash is toxic, containing arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health concerns including cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

For months, the TVA has been undergoing a huge cleanup effort that is estimated to cost as much as $1 billion before it is complete. The cleanup effort includes shipping recovered coal ash from the spill site and storing it in distant landfills, including Arrowhead Landfill in Perry County.

Source: WSFA-TV

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Perry County residents still upset about recovered coal ash storage

“Money ain’t worth everything,” says Mary Gibson Holley, a retired teacher in Uniontown, in an interview with the New York Times.“In the long run, they ain’t looking about what this could do to the community if something goes wrong.”

When the coal ash spill occurred in east Tennessee last December, it knocked houses from their foundations, destroyed land, and contaminated nearby waterways. People living near the spill have reported heightened anxiety and respiratory problems. Even a young child was tested positive for heavy metals in his blood. Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese which have been linked to serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few.

It is estimated that the TVA will spend close to $1 billion before its cleanup effort in east Tennessee is complete. That cleanup includes relocating the recovered coal ash to landfills in other states, including the Arrowhead Landfill in Uniontown, Ala.

Arrowhead is getting about 8,500 tons of recovered coal ash. The deal, arranged by the TVA and state and county officials, has brought 30 new jobs to the area and will bring in more than $3 million in “host fees.” The benefits sound like a great deal for the very poor and mostly black county. And even some environmentalists say storage at the Arrowhead site is ideal, with dry storage dug into a nearly impermeable bed about 600 feet above the water table.

But lack of trust runs high in Perry County, where residents fear environmental hazards, such as tornadoes and flooding, not to mention equipment failures, might cause another spill like that in east Tennessee.

“We’ve been taken advantage of by several groups of powers that be,” said Robert Bamberg, a catfish farmer and organizer of Concerned Citizens of Perry County, a group of landfill opponents. “There’s a sense among the population that we’ve been thrown under the bus.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Uniontown residents concerned about shipments of coal ash

The spill destroyed homes and damaged property, creating one of the largest environmental disasters in U.S. history. It also stirred up a flurry of concern from concerned citizens and environmentalists who argue that coal ash sites should fall under federal regulation as a hazardous material, as the material can be detrimental to human life.

Wet-ash plants store unburned coal byproducts washed out with water from the boiler and smokestacks. Those byproducts are stored in water-covered landfills. Dry ash is waste vacuumed out and collected in silos.

“We are going to go dry with all of our fly ash and we are going to de-water our gypsum and make it more marketable,” TVA vice president John Kammeyer told the Associated Press. ”If we can’t sell it, we will dry stack it.”

The conversion from wet-ash storage to dry-ash storage will likely cost a pretty penny for the utility, which is already spending close to $1 billion to clean up the mess left behind after the spill. Three consulting firms helped develop what TVA officials call a comprehensive plan for safer storage. “It is a big deal. It is a big effort,” said Kammeyer.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA proposes to convert wet-ash storage to dry ash

Environmentalists criticized the EPA for allowing the TVA to rate its own facilities. Two weeks after the protests, the TVA raised the hazard level of two coal ash storage ponds in Tennessee and two in Alabama. In a letter to the EPA, the TVA defended the move, saying it changed the ratings “in the interest of taking a conservative, self-critical approach.” The ratings do not gauge the likelihood of dam failure, rather the potential damage that could occur if the dam fails.

Last December, a coal ash storage pond at the TVA’s Kingston, Tennessee facility failed, spilling more than a billion gallons of coal ash on to more than 300 acres of a neighboring community. The spill damaged homes and destroyed property, contaminated local waterways, and has made residents in the area ill. The TVA is currently involved in a massive cleanup of the area, which is expected to cost nearly $1 billion before it is complete.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA rates coal ash dumps in Alabama, Tennessee as ‘high hazard’

The phrase is repeated over and over in a short film by Alabama activist Betsy Ramaccia. You can view the film on www.AshHoles.org. Last month at a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) meeting in Tennessee, Ramaccia dressed in a haz-mat suit and handed out fake newspapers with the headline “The New Ash Hole of Alabama,” and directed them to the Web site. There, viewers can hear the voices and see the faces of several Uniontown, Alabama residents pleading with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to protect them from the dangers of coal ash. The Web site also has a form letter asking for protection where people can add their names and e-mails and submit them to Jackson.

“This is a case of environmental injustice, in which an underrepresented population of mostly African-American citizens who live at or below the poverty line are being taken advantage of. I ask that you protect me and my fellow citizens of Uniontown, Alabama, and the United States of America by calling coal ash what it is: a toxic substance that needs to be federally regulated,” the letter reads.

Earlier this week, the EPA approved the TVA’s request to store more than half of the toxic coal ash it recovers from east Tennessee site on which it spilled last December when a TVA impoundment pond burst, to a landfill near Uniontown in Perry County. Perry County is one of the poorest counties in Alabama. More than 30 percent of its population lives in poverty and the vast majority of residents are African-American.

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic and lead, which have been associated with serious health concerns.

Is it right to store dangerous material if it only affects the poor? Residents who expressed themselves on Ramaccia’s film don’t think so: “Ms. Jackson. Please help us here in Uniontown, Alabama.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Uniontown residents plead with EPA, ‘Will you help us?’

Perry County is populated by predominantly blacks and is one of the poorest counties in the state where more than 30 percent of families live in poverty. Residents there will benefit from the plan, gaining about 50 jobs and earning millions off dumping fees. However, opponents say the plan is unjust.

More than a billion gallons of coal ash poured on Kingston, Tennessee, last December after a TVA coal ash impoundment breached. The massive wave of coal ash toppled houses, destroyed property and contaminated nearby waterways.

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins that have been associated with serious health concerns such as cancer and liver damage. Those living in and around Kingston, Tennessee, where the coal ash spilled, have reported more respiratory problems and heightened anxiety. Some, including a toddler, have already tested positive for heavy metals in their blood.

“As if the initial spread of sludge from the TVA was not bad enough, shipping that much coal ash to Perry County, Alabama, seems very short sighted,” says Rhon Jones, Toxic Torts Section Head with Beasley Allen Law Firm. “I feel certain that many residents of Perry County share our concern that this plan is not in the best interest of Perry County citizens.”

Source: New York Times

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › EPA approves TVA’s bid to store recovered coal ash in Alabama

“I’m not crazy about it,” said Hank James in an interview with the Tuscaloosa News. “From what I’ve read, it doesn’t sound like a great thing for any community to deal with.”

Coal ash is not classified as a hazardous material by the Environmental Protection Agency, but since 2000, improved pollution controls have kept toxins from leaving smokestacks and thus have increased the amount of toxins in coal ash. The material may contain arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which can contribute to serious health complications such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

When the coal ash spill occurred last December, more than a billion gallons poured over 300 acres of a nearby community, knocking homes off their foundations and piling as high as nine feet in some areas. Numerous people have been displaced, some have suffered medical complications, and despite TVA’s claims to fully restore the property, some say it will always hold traces of dangerous materials that can harm wildlife and plant life that live off the land and in the waterways.

More than half of the recovered coal ash is expected to be stored in the rural Alabama town. A breach similar to that at the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) plant in Kingston, Tennessee, could devastate the impoverished Perry County.

Perry County officials contend that the Arrowhead Landfill, where the recovered coal ash will be stored, was built to modern standards and is in full compliance with ADEM regulations. The landfill is lined with a heavy plastic to keep toxins from seeping into the ground and a purification system is capable of cleaning the fluids to a level clean enough to dump into nearby streams. A series of wells will help monitor to ensure hazardous toxins don’t get into drinking water.

But those reassurances aren’t enough to sway some concerned citizens. “As far as making any kind of benefit for this community, I don’t see any,” says John Osemer, 87, a lifelong resident of Uniontown.

Image courtesy Tuscaloosa News

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Recovered toxic coal ash to be stored in rural Alabama

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, barium, chromium and manganese, which have been associated with serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

“I don’t know what Tennessee law is, but under Pennsylvania law it would probably have to go to a residual waste landfill,” said Tom Rathbun, spokesman for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

A TVA spokesperson says it already had given up on storing the recovered coal ash in the Pennsylvania coal mines as the mines were not properly lined to prevent the toxins from leaching into the ground.

Meanwhile, TVA has located landfills in Alabama and Georgia to store the 1.1 billion gallons of coal ash that poured from a breached impoundment pond, destroying neighboring homes and property. Both sites are Class 1 landfills. One is located in Mauk, Georgia and the other in Uniontown, Alabama.

The TVA’s cleanup effort has caused headaches for the utility, which estimates it will spend as much as $975 million to restore the land. It could be months before the cleanup is complete.

Source: Forbes/Associated Press

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Pennsylvania says no to TVA coal ash storage

The locations were identified through TVA documents and interviews as a landfill in Taylor County near Mauk, Georgia, and a municipal waste landfill in Perry County in west central Alabama. According to landfill officials in Georgia and Alabama, the facilities are lined with both clay and synthetic barriers, which offers more protection than the unlined surface where the TVA stored ash at its Kingston, Tennessee plant.

Coal ash contains toxic material such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been found to cause serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

According to The Institute for Southern Studies, the communities slated to receive the coal ash did not have a chance for meaningful involvement in the decision to store the coal ash in its landfills. Neither the TVA nor regulatory authorities provided an opportunity for public comment.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Poor, black counties to receive coal ash from TVA cleanup

The TVA had asked for more time to carry out those orders, requesting one more year – to 2012 – to install smokestack scrubbers at its John Sevier plant in Rogersville, Tennessee, and two more years – to 2014 – to carry out other pollution controls. U.S. District Judge Lacy Thornburg denied the TVA’s request, saying North Carolina’s experts offered a more compelling argument than the TVA.

The order came within a month of another pricey situation for the utility. On December 22nd, a coal ash impoundment pond at the TVA’s Kingston, Tennessee plant spilled over, dumping 1.1 billion gallons on to 300 acres of an east Tennessee community. The utility is currently undergoing a huge cleanup operation which is expected to cost the TVA between $525 million and $825 million.

The TVA has not yet decided whether it will appeal the entire ruling. “This is a fiscal problem for us,” said TVA Chairman Bill Sansom. “Can we fiscally do what the court tells us to do?”

The lawsuit was originally filed in January 2006 by North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper, arguing that the TVA needed to take stronger measures to reduce the emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury that were drifting east and polluting the air in the North Carolina mountains.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Judge denies TVA’s request for more time to carry out pollution controls

The massive spill is considered one of the worst environmental disasters, destroying homes and damaging property. The toll on wildlife, plant life and, ultimately, human life, is yet to be determined. Cleanup efforts are expected to cost TVA between $525 million and $825 million depending on how many times the waste will have to be moved and how fast crews can dredge the Emory River.

How the utility will pay for cleaning up the mess is yet to be determined. TVA officials say insurance should cover some of the mounting costs, but other options may also need to be considered, such as disposing of assets, using debt and raising power rates. The latter option likely will come with some criticism.

Last fall the utility’s board approved a 20 percent electric rate hike – the highest in almost 20 years – due to escalating fuel costs. As a small tradeoff, TVA lowered its fuel charge by 6 percent in January and said it will cut another 7 percent effective April 1, resulting in a savings of about $4 to $9 in TVA residential customers’ power bills.

TVA provides electricity to about 8.8 million million customers in Tennessee and parts of Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia, according to the report.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Will customers have to pay for TVA’s coal ash disaster?

In 2003 and 2006, two small leaks occurred at the Kingston plant, which raised the interest of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. That agency asked TVA to provide more information about the leaks but did not require a new storage system.

A TVA spokesman says the two smaller leaks were not related to December’s pond failure, and in both cases repairs were made to the ponds to stop the slow leaks. A 2008 inspection report of the Kingston ponds indicated that there were no structural problems with the ponds. However, officials say that the report indicated that TVA was irresponsible for not realizing that the previous spills pointed toward a serious stability problem.

Coal ash ponds are not regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because the EPA doesn’t consider the coal ash to be hazardous material. Federal agents oversee coal mines but don’t regulate the burning power plants. Some experts say states have done a poor job of monitoring the coal ash ponds.

Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen said he is working to provide stronger oversight of the coal ash ponds in his state. Other states where TVA has coal ash ponds or landfills include Alabama and Kentucky.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Previous leaks should have signaled warning

The leak, discovered before 6 a.m. has been stopped, according to John Moulton, with the Tennessee Valley Authority.

Advertisement

“Some materials flowed into Widows Creek, although most of the leakage remained in the settling pond,” he said.

Gypsum is a byproduct of coal-burning power plants when “scrubbers” are added that use limestone spray to clean air emissions. This pulls sulfur dioxide from the emissions.

Tighter air emissions controls result in additional waste byproducts. Gypsum can be used in building materials.

Alabama environmental officials were on their way as of 10:15 a.m. Central Time to an spill at TVA’s Widows Creek coal-fired power plant in northeastern Alabama.

Scott Hughes, spokesman for the Alabama Department of Environmental Management said, “The only thing we’ve got right now is that there was a release from a gypsum treatment operation.”

“We do understand that some of the material has reached Widows Creek.”

The creek from which TVA’s coal burning plant gets its name, crosses the plant property. Gypsum can be sold for use in wallboard, but markets have been slow and it like more standard ash can build up in waste ponds.

“We’re in the process of gathering more info and getting a full report.”

Kingston is the scene of a TVA ash pond that ruptured: Early on the morning of Dec. 22, more than a billion gallons of sludge flowed out of the pond, damaging a dozen homes and creating environmental havoc along the Emory River.

The Widows Creek Fossil Plant is located on Guntersville Reservoir on the Tennessee River. It has eight coal-fired units and was completed in 1965. The plant consumes about 10,000 tons of coal a day. The ash from that coal was in the pond that broke there.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › 2nd coal ash spill reported in Alabama

Montgomery, Ala. – Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., has filed a class action suit on behalf of property owners damaged by the Dec. 22, 2008 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) spill at the Kingston Fossil Plant. Located 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn., the plant released 1.1 billion gallons of toxin-laden sludge into a rural neighborhood when a waste storage pond retaining wall failed. The suit is filed against the TVA, the nation’s largest public utility, over potentially the most significant environmental disaster since the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Beasley Allen will be working with attorneys Gary Davis and Mary Parker in Tennessee, both of whom have Environmental experience. Beasley Allen has its own Environmental department to handle cases such as this disaster. The firm has handled previous environmental claims including a $700 million settlement with Monsanto/Solutia in Anniston, Ala., over PCB contamination, the largest environmental settlement in American history. More recently, Beasley Allen obtained a $20.7 million verdict against manufacturers of carbon black for nearby property owners, a verdict that was upheld by the United States Supreme Court.

Coal-fired power plants produce coal ash and other toxic waste byproducts. The material is usually stored on site in retention ponds or dams. A failure in the retaining wall, or an overflow, can result in an environmental disaster contaminating surrounding waterways, soil, and wildlife, and endangering human health and life.

There is ongoing debate about how coal ash is stored and regulated. Currently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not regulate these types of retention ponds or the materials contained in them. Surprisingly, the EPA does not consider the coal ash hazardous material. There is a great deal of debate over whether state regulations are sufficient to regulate these retention ponds, as evidenced by this most recent disaster.

“It is absolutely incredible that there is no real oversight for the storage and safe disposal of this toxic waste,” said Beasley Allen attorney Rhon Jones, who specializes in Environmental issues. “Most of these retention ponds are not lined or reinforced, and it’s inevitable that potentially hazardous material will leak out. They just are not a long-term solution. It’s only a matter of time before the next disaster. These facilities are everywhere – Alabama, Tennessee. Communities are living under a cloud, uncertain of their safety.”

There is a U.S. Senate hearing set for Jan. 8 to review the Tennessee disaster that will include representatives from the TVA and environmental groups. Beasley Allen attorneys have contacted Congressional leaders offering to speak at the hearings, and lawyers from the Beasley Allen team will be present in Washington.

SOURCE: Beasley Allen Law Firm

COMPLAINT:Official class action complaint filed in TVA case

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Beasley Allen files coal ash spill class action lawsuit on behalf of residents and property owners affected

MONTGOMERY, ALA. – Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., is currently evaluating claims on behalf of property owners affected by a devastating coal ash spill in Tennessee. The disaster spilled thousands of pounds of coal ash and toxic waste across more than 300 acres. The event occurred when an earthen retaining wall at the Kingston Fossil Plant failed, creating one of the largest coal fly ash spills in the United States. The plant is located 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn.

Coal-fired power plants produce coal ash and other toxic waste byproducts. The waste contains such heavy metals as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese, which have been shown to cause cancer, liver damage, and neurological complications. The material is usually stored on site at the energy-production facilities in retention ponds or dams. A failure in the dam’s retaining wall, or an overflow, can result in an environmental disaster contaminating surrounding waterways, soil, and wildlife, and endangering human health and life.

There are coal ash retention ponds at nine locations in Alabama, including six coal-fired steam plants operated by Alabama Power Company. The Tennessee Valley Authority (T.V.A.), which operates the Tennessee plant that failed, also has two coal-fired plants in north Alabama that have ash retention ponds; and PowerSouth Energy Cooperative has a coal ash pond at Lowman Power Plant in southwest Alabama.

“Given that the Tennessee Valley Authority has similar ponds at its two coal-fired plants in Alabama, we hope that they are making certain that those ponds are sound so that we will not have another tragedy like the one at TVA’s Kingston Steam Plant,” said Rhon Jones, an attorney with Beasley Allen who specializes in Environmental law. “Residents and property owners near all nine coal ash retention ponds in Alabama are counting on these ponds to be safe and secure. No property owner should have to go through the disaster facing those persons in Tennessee near the Kingston Steam Plant.”

According to Alabama’s Department of Environmental Management, all nine coal-fired power plants in Alabama were inspected following the Tennessee disaster, and all passed inspection with no problems. However, there is some debate about how coal ash is stored and regulated. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not regulate these types of retention ponds or the materials contained in them. Surprisingly, the EPA does not consider the coal ash hazardous material. There is a great deal of debate over whether state regulations are sufficient to regulate these retention ponds, as evidenced by this most recent disaster. For the greatest protection to the public, we recommend coal ash should be buried in lined landfills rather than retention ponds or dams, to prevent it from leaking out and contaminating waterways, groundwater and soil.

SOURCE: Beasley Allen Press Release

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Beasley Allen evaluating claims resulting from Tennessee coal-ash spill disaster, eyeing safety of Alabama plants

December 30, 2008

The online environmental community is abuzz with reports of all kinds about the coal ash sludge spill in Tennessee, ranging from first-hand accounts to health concerns to worries about coal in general. Twitter in particular has been a place where people have been posting news stories and concerns.

A local blog also posted before and after photos of the affected area.

Joe Romm blogs at ClimateProgress that the muck has a lot of people worried about how easy it would be for another such spill to happen:

Coal ash deposits in the USA are now under renewed scrutiny after a giant spill just before Christmas released 5.4 million cubic yards of toxic sludge into Tennessee waterways. Water tests near the spill from the Kingston Fossil Plant showed elevated levels of lead and thallium, which can cause birth defects and nervous and reproductive system disorders. The spill muddied the waters in the Emory river and is flowing into tributaries of the Tennessee River – the water supply for Chattanooga and millions of people living downstream in Alabama, Tennessee and Kentucky.

So now a big question mark hangs over the hundreds of coal plants all across the country which store their fly ash in unlined embankments and ponds — like the one that failed last week. Most are situated near rivers that supply water needed by the coal plants to operate.

The NY Times reported that in the US, coal plants produce 129 million tons of postcombustion byproducts a year. It’s the second-largest waste stream in the country, after municipal solid waste, and it’s storage and handling is unregulated. Who knew?

Source: Huffington Post

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Tennessee Coal Ash Spill Before And After — And What’s Next