TVA CEO Tom Kilgore, however, will continue to receive a $300,000 annual retention bonus for another four years on top of his base salary of $875,000. TVA director Dennis Bottorff said that despite the bonus, Kilgore’s income is about 45 percent lower than the average top executive at other utilities.

Fiscal year 2009 has been difficult for the TVA. Not only has a downturn in the economy resulted in a 7 percent drop in electricity sales in the utility’s seven-state region, but TVA is shelling out an estimated $1 billion to clean up land in east Tennessee after its Kingston, Tenn., coal ash impoundment pond breached, sending a wave of toxic material on to 300 acres of a neighboring community. Not included in that cleanup cost is the millions paid out by TVA to buy homes and land damaged by the spill. The utility is also facing numerous lawsuits from residents who were harmed or lost property in that spill.

The only good news in the TVA’s end-of-year report is that the rest of TVA’s 12,000 employees will be eligible for raises in fiscal year 2010. “You see a lot of really substantial progress being made on many fronts in TVA,” Bottorff told the Associated Press. “It is unfortunate that we see an event which overshadows that performance or an economy that we all live in that detracts from that performance.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA executives will not receive raises, performance bonuses this year

But if Crossville Coal Company and Smith Mountain Solutions have their way and are allowed to reclaim a surface mine on top of Smith Mountain to store coal ash recovered from the east Tennessee site of a massive coal ash spill, the narrow roadway where the Nicholsons walk will become even more treacherous with heavy trucks carrying tons of coal ash.

Smith Mountain Solutions says it will make safety improvements to the road and enforce low speed limits with GPS tracking, which would ultimately be a benefit to residents in the area. But few locals find the promise reassuring. Their concerns go beyond traffic issues. They are worried about their property and their health.

Coal ash is not categorized a hazardous material and thus does not fall under federal regulations. Last year, when a coal ash impoundment pond at the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston, Tenn., site breached and sent a wave of toxic material onto a rural community, the government and environmental groups took a closer look at coal ash and realized just how dangerous the material can be.

Tests have determined that coal ash has become more and more toxic over the years, as technological advances have improved the quality of smoke that is released into the air. The coal ash left behind has been shown to contain toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few. As a result, the Environmental Protection Agency has been inspecting coal ash impoundments nationwide and is expected to provide guidelines by the end of the year.

Meanwhile, the TVA is undergoing a years-long, $1.2 billion cleanup effort at the site of the massive coal ash spill in east Tennessee. That cleanup includes removing the spilled coal ash and shipping it to other landfills for storage. One landfill that is currently receiving the reclaimed coal ash is in Alabama.

TVA is eyeing the Smith Mountain landfill as another storage site but residents are fighting the plan. Not only will the traffic along Smith Mountain Road be heavier, thanks to trucks hauling tons of recovered coal ash, but there is the threat of the coal ash leaching into the soil and contaminating the land and drinking water. And then there’s the risk of another breach like that in Kingston, which toppled houses, damaged property and displaced numerous residents.

Proponents of the Smith Mountain landfill plan say it would be a win-win for the community. Not only would it ensure improvements of Smith Mountain Road, it will create jobs and generate millions of dollars in fees for the community. The companies have also promised to ensure the safety of the landfill with synthetic liners to cut down on leaching.

But arguments for the landfill have fallen on deaf ears. “This has been sold to us as a win-win proposition, which it clearly is not unless you are one of a couple of groups,” says Smith Mountain resident Earl Tyler.

Source: Crossville Chronicle

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Smith Mountain residents fight coal ash landfill

That spill, called one of the largest environmental disasters in U.S. history, knocked houses off their foundations, damaged property and contaminated waterways. The TVA is currently undergoing an estimated three-year, $1.2 billion cleanup effort to restore the land.

That’s just the kind of nightmare Kentucky residents don’t want to experience. A major spill from a larger coal ash pond built on the Ohio River flood plain could easily contaminate Louisville’s drinking water uptake just 30 miles downstream.

LG&E and Kentucky Division of Water officials say the pond wouldn’t affect the drinking water. But environmentalists have concerns. Coal ash is not categorized as a hazardous material and thus does not currently fall under federal regulation. But the massive Tennessee spill shed new light on coal ash.

Tests have shown that coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. As a result of last year’s devastating spill, the Environmental Protection Agency has been ordered to review all coal ash ponds in the country. The agency is expected to issue new rules for handling coal ash sometime in December.

Source: Chicago Tribune

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Activists fight coal ash pond expansion along Ohio River

The last thing residents want is for the public to view that mess at will, even while the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) undergoes a years-long, $1.2 billion cleanup of the mess it made. Those residents this week applauded a decision made by the TVA to keep an overlook area closed to the general public. Instead, the area will remain behind a locked gate and only be used for scheduled tours, visits by members of Congress and their staffs, other public officials, and the media.

“I am pleased that the TVA has taken into account the thoughts and wishes of the community this ash spill has affected and stopped plans for a public overlook,” says Randy Ellis, who serves on a community advisory panel.

While praised by some, the TVA’s announcement brought criticism from other residents, saying the TVA’s plan to make the overlook a public viewing area was never announced in the first place, says Roane County Executive Mike Farmer. He says he found out about the initial plans through word-of-mouth. “That is indicative of the issue we’ve had all long – a lack of communication between TVA and the county,” he says.

While he appreciates the nation’s largest utility’s willingness to be more transparent, “I really don’t want to draw neon signs to (the disaster),” he adds. “At least they’re working with us a little bit.”

Source: Knox News

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA keeps overlook of coal ash spill site closed to general public

Last January, just one month after a coal ash pond at the TVA’s Kingston, Tenn., plant broke, sending a wave of toxic sludge on to 300 acres of neighboring property and waterways, contaminated water accidentally leaked from the Widows Creek plant. The TVA recalculated that pond’s rating as “high hazard” and spent $2 million to upgrade the ponds. The nation’s largest utility vowed to convert the ponds from wet to dry storage, considered a safer storage alternative. And, as a precaution, TVA also is buying property adjacent to the coal ash ponds where the leak occurred, land that is also adjacent to McCraw’s farm, property that is also historically significant as the site of the Civil War’s Battle of Bridgeport.

“We definitely don’t want to sell, but it’s scary for us,” McCraw says. “We fought the federal government on this land in the Civil War. I hope it doesn’t come to that again.”

Six weeks ago McCraw talked with officials from TVA and told them he was not interested in selling his land. He says he hasn’t heard from the utility since. But he fears the fight isn’t over. If the TVA doesn’t buy his land, what threat are he and his property under? Could contaminated water leak into the ground again? Could another spill like the one in Kingston occur on his land?

“I don’t know if it is dangerous or not, but we’ve asked and asked both TVA or ADEM (Alabama Department of Environmental Management) to check to see if there is a problem,” McCraw said.

Meanwhile, others in the area are not taking any chances. Darren McCloud readily sold 66 acres of his land just north of the Widows Creek ash ponds this summer to the TVA, and used the money to build a new home six miles away.

Sources:
Times Free Press
Gadsden Times

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Families weigh decision to move away from TVA coal ash storage site

This hidden layer of ash, called “slime” by AECOM engineer Bill Walton, was made up of fly ash, water and sediment and, though less than six inches thick, created instability in the pond. As it eluded detection by TVA engineer over the years, its “creep failure” of slimes and liquefaction triggered the massive spill.

These four factors worked together to create what Walton said acted almost like “a perfect storm.” Residents would likely call it a perfect disaster. The massive wave of coal ash that tumbled from the breached pond dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring community, knocking homes off their foundation and pouring into the Emory River. Coal ash contains dangers toxins that have been linked to serious health concerns. Already, some residents in the area, including a young child, have tested positive for heavy metals in their blood.

The findings from AECOM will be reviewed by an advisory group made up of personnel from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, the University of Tennessee, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and geotechnical consultants from Science Applications International Corporation.

Stephen Smith, executive director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, offers this perspective: “One would think that TVA, with its vast engineering experience, would have known to look for this material.”

Sources:
New York Times
Knoxville News Sentinel Co.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Four factors worked like ‘perfect storm’ to cause coal ash spill

Glen and Lisa Sexton

To make matters worse, the “tsunami” of fly ash that poured down the river after heavy rains last month exacerbated Lisa’s auto-immune disorder. In short, the environmental disaster has made a disaster of the life they once had in Kingston.

It’s not much better for Gary Topmiller and his family, who live across from the spill site. “We started getting sick as soon as this happened,” he said. “We just keep getting sick … We’re tired of being sick.”

Residents affected by the TVA coal ash spill spoke to U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, who came to Roane County last weekend to hear first-hand what residents were suffering through. Johnson heads the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, which has oversight of the TVA.

“This is a bit more serious than we anticipated,” Johnson said. “We didn’t know the frustration is at this level. I think we now have a real good understanding of how the community is being affected. I feel like the reports we’ve gotten have been incomplete. I will give you my commitment that we will look into what we heard today.”

Source: Knox News

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Congressional subcommittee chair hears complaints of coal ash victims

“Our farm is the largest acreage affected,” said Sandy’s husband Terry in an interview to the Chattanooga Times Free Press. “TVA does not want to admit that the spill has devastated our lives, tainted our land and reduced our livelihood to a fraction of what it was before the spill.”

The Guptons herd Gelvy cattle on their land, and worried for their cattle’s safety after the TVA’s coal ash pond failed last December and dumped more than a billion gallons of coal ash on to 300 acres of an east Tennessee community. Now, they are worrying about their own health. “We have both tested positive for heavy metals in our bodies,” Terry said. “We both have increased respiratory problems with asthma… We feel that we need to relocated to get away from the spill site.”

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic and lead, which have been associated with increased risk of cancer, liver damage and other serious health problems. When it rains, coal ash sludge backs up on to the Gupton’s pastures. As it dries, the ash flies into the air.

“I wouldn’t want to inhale either of these things for a long period of time — or even a short period of time if I had lung problems,” said Gregory V. Button, a University of Tennessee at Knoxville professor and medical anthropologist, in the news report. “There’s a lot of possibility here for exposing large populations with what may be very high concentrations of ash contaminated with a combination of toxic materials.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Family worries about cattle, health, livelihood after coal ash spill

Cancer rates

The EPA screening study conducted in 2002 was not made public until March 4, 2009. Numerous attempts to get the information made public through the Freedom of Information Act to the EPA during the Bush Administration were denied or released with the risk estimates blacked out. The data finally made public after seven years shows that cancer risk is substantially higher for up to one out of every 50 Americans living near wet ponds used to dispose of ash and scrubber sludge from coal-fired power plants across the United States.

The analysis focuses on 100 landfills and 110 surface impoundments examined by the EPA that lack effective synthetic liners to prevent leaks as the EPA found unlined and clay-lined waste units present far greater risks to both human health and ecosystems. These high-risk coal ash dump sites are in more than 35 states.

According to the report: “Can living next to one of these dumpsites increase your risk of getting cancer or other diseases? The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) thinks so, especially if you live near one of those wet ash ponds, or surface impoundments, that dot the landscape near large coal plants, the pond has no protective liner, and you get your drinking water from a well … (N)earby residents have as much as a 1 in 50 chance of getting cancer from drinking water contaminated by arsenic, one of the most common, and most dangerous, pollutants from coal ash. And that’s not all. That same risk assessment says that living near ash ponds increases the risk of damage to the liver, kidney, lungs and other organs as a result of being exposed to toxic metals like cadmium, cobalt, lead, and other pollutants at concentrations far above levels that are considered safe. In addition, the danger to wildlife and ecosystems is simply off the charts, with one contaminant—boron—expected to leach into the environment at levels two thousand times thresholds generally considered to be safe.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Study: Cancer risk ‘disturbingly’ higher near coal ash ponds

Both the House and the Senate approved the legislation, however the House rewrote the language, requiring the bill to pass back through the Senate for final approval. The bill will not allow laying liners on existing facilities and placing more coal ash on top.

The bill is just one effort by lawmakers to make coal-burning facilities like that in Kingston safer. Last December’s coal ash pond breach dumped more than a billion gallons of coal ash sending a wave as high as 9 feet on to nearby homes and property. Houses were knocked off their foundations, property was damaged, and several residents in the area had little choice but to flee.

Preventing another environmental disaster like the TVA coal ash spill has been on the forefront with legislators, environments and residents alike raising questions about the hundreds of U.S. power plants that produce more than 125 million tons of coal combustion waste each year. Coal ash is currently listed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as non-hazardous and thus does not fall under strict governmental regulations, says Rhon Jones, Toxic Torts Section Head with Beasley Allen law firm.

As a result of the Kingston coal ash spill, the EPA committed to propose new regulations governing coal combustion waste by the end of 2009. The EPA also committed to act immediately to prevent more spills in the future.

“Hopefully, these actions by EPA and Congress will either increase safety near these facilities, require alternative methods of disposal, or both,” Jones adds.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Lawmakers, EPA search for methods to prevent future coal ash spills

However, the method for the regulation of coal ash has come under scrutiny after a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) impoundment pond failed last December and dumped more than a billion gallons of coal ash sludge over 300 acres of an east Tennessee community, destroying homes and damaging property in its wake. Both residents and environmentalists began asking questions about the toxic material that had poured into the neighboring Emory River and heaped as much as nine feet high in some areas.

Since 2000, improved pollution controls have kept toxins from leaving smokestacks and thus have increased the amount of toxins in coal ash, says Rhon Jones, Toxic Torts Section Head with Beasley Allen law firm. The material may contain arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium which can contribute to dangerous health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few.

Many residents in the area already have complained of respiratory problems and half reported experiencing increased stress and anxiety. “In addition, EPA has improved testing which reveals toxins are leaching into groundwater more than originally thought,” Jones adds.

To date, EPA has found groundwater contaminated with heavy metals from coal ash dumps at 63 sites. An independent report asserts that nearly 100 coal ash dumps across the United States pose similar or even greater potential dangers than the TVA Kingston plant, Jones says.

“On March 9, 2009, EPA sent a survey to the 163 utilities that manage approximately 300 coal ash ponds in the U.S. The survey calls for plant operators to provide information about coal ash pond design, engineering, and inspections and to list any spills or unauthorized releases within the last decade. While a step in the right direction, EPA’s survey does not ask for information on whether the coal ash ponds are lined, whether the ponds have water collection systems to catch toxins leached from the ash, or whether groundwater monitors are in place near the ponds,” Jones says.

After survey results are reviewed, EPA plans to follow up with on-site visits and order improvements where the ponds are found to be unsafe.

In response to the December 22, 2008 coal ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee, the EPA committed to propose new regulations governing coal combustion waste by the end of 2009. The EPA also committed to act immediately to prevent accidents such as the TVA spill in Kingston.

“The Kingston, Tennessee, spill and others like it show the need for strict standards on how this waste is disposed. In addition to EPA’s renewed interest in regulating coal ash disposal, the U.S. Congress is looking into the spill,” Jones says. “Hopefully, these actions by EPA and Congress will either increase safety near these facilities, require alternative methods of disposal, or both.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Coal combustion sites need government regulations

The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) ordered total remediation so that the utility must clean up the site completely. That cleanup effort is so massive it could take years to complete and is estimated to cost the utility between $525 million and $825 million.

“It is unlikely that the land can be fully restored to conditions present before the spill,” says Rhon Jones, Toxic Torts Section Head with Beasley Allen law firm. “It will take a long time for the area to heal, and the long-term effects may not be known entirely for some time.”

Coal ash may contain dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium which can contribute to dangerous health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, to name a few. Many residents already have complained of respiratory problems and half reported experiencing increased stress and anxiety.

The TVA has offered buyouts to many of the victims of the coal ash spill, “but it is unclear whether residents, in their desperation to leave the hazardous conditions, are getting fair deals,” Jones says. “Our firm is working on behalf of individuals and a class of clients. Through these cases, we are working to 1) Bring about a complete cleanup of the area; 2) Ensure that our clients are fully compensated for the damage to their property (including their property values); and, 3) Obtain long-term medical monitoring relief for area residents who have been exposed to the dangerous contaminants in TVA’s coal ash sludge. “

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Coal ash victims may not get the compensation they deserve

The engineers concerns about the stability of the pond walls are detailed in documents released earlier this year by the TVA. The documents were requested by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) in an effort to pinpoint why the pond breach occurred in the first place.

The documents show that the dikes making up the coal ash pond were in frequent need of maintenance and re-engineering. TVA officials made decisions based on opinions of both in-house engineers and consulting engineers. The pond’s most recent stability inspection – which showed nothing that would indicate failure – occurred just two months before the spill.

So far, the utility has spent more than $68 million cleaning up the mess, and that cost is expected to rise to as high as $825 million. The utility also has spent $11 million to buy out property from locals affected by the spill. Additional expenses are expected to cover litigation, penalties and settlements.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Engineers raised questions about coal ash pond walls decades ago

TVA also faces millions of dollars in pollution control expenses due to an environmental court ruling in North Carolina that ordered the TVA to accelerate its cleanup actions so the plants would stop polluting the air in neighboring North Carolina. Those improvements are expected to cost the utility $1.8 billion – about $1 billion more than the TVA had expected to pay.

Adding to TVA’s headache is the downturn of the economy, which has resulted in a 5 percent drop in power sales. TVA relies on the sale of power to generate revenue. The utility also experienced a $3 billion loss to its corporate retirement fund.

TVA CEO Bill Sansom is encouraged by the recent drop in fuel prices, but says he cannot guarantee that the company will not raise rates given the financial constraints the utility has come under.

“I hope these energy costs keep coming down enough that we can help not increase your customers’ rates. I know this winter it has been tough because we’ve had the higher rates and a cold winter. So we are very conscious of that,” he said.

TVA will set its fiscal 2010 budget in August.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA may have to raise customers’ rates to relieve financial woes

The new coal ash byproduct, called Cenocell, has good insulating properties and is fire resistant, making it an ideal replacement for concrete, wood and other materials used in various applications in construction, transportation and aerospace.

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic and lead which can, as in the case of the TVA spill, damage property and may lead to serious health complications. The new product, however, is not considered harmful and in fact, is being touted as a “green” product because unlike cement, Cenocell does not generate carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

“This material could help develop communities by allowing people living near coal-burning facilities to create a new industry and new jobs,” Doyoyo said. “This could be an engine of development for people who have been struggling. It really is a material with a social conscience.”

This may not be exciting news to those living in communities in close proximity to coal-burning facilities. The alternative uses for coal ash do not stop the coal-burning fumes from polluting the air nor does it eliminate the threat of another devastating coal ash spill, like that caused when a TVA coal ash pond failed last December and dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic material on to a neighboring community. Rather than alternative uses for coal ash, many are asking for greener alternatives to coal-burning all together.

Doyoyo will present Cenocell and his findings at the World of Coal Ash meeting May 4-7, 2009.

Source:
Reliable Plant

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Scientist develops new product from coal ash

The TVA had asked for more time to carry out those orders, requesting one more year – to 2012 – to install smokestack scrubbers at its John Sevier plant in Rogersville, Tennessee, and two more years – to 2014 – to carry out other pollution controls. U.S. District Judge Lacy Thornburg denied the TVA’s request, saying North Carolina’s experts offered a more compelling argument than the TVA.

The order came within a month of another pricey situation for the utility. On December 22nd, a coal ash impoundment pond at the TVA’s Kingston, Tennessee plant spilled over, dumping 1.1 billion gallons on to 300 acres of an east Tennessee community. The utility is currently undergoing a huge cleanup operation which is expected to cost the TVA between $525 million and $825 million.

The TVA has not yet decided whether it will appeal the entire ruling. “This is a fiscal problem for us,” said TVA Chairman Bill Sansom. “Can we fiscally do what the court tells us to do?”

The lawsuit was originally filed in January 2006 by North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper, arguing that the TVA needed to take stronger measures to reduce the emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury that were drifting east and polluting the air in the North Carolina mountains.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Judge denies TVA’s request for more time to carry out pollution controls

This is the sixth federal lawsuit filed against the TVA as a result of the utility’s coal ash pond breach last December that flooded an east Tennessee community with more than a billion gallons of coal ash sludge. Not only did the massive spill destroy houses and damage property, it also poured into the neighboring Emory River. Coal ash contains toxic material such as arsenic, lead, barium, manganese and chromium, which can be harmful to human health.

This latest lawsuit against the utility claims the TVA “submitted a vague, misleading and piecemeal environmental assessment and remediation plan which, in significant places, massaged the data and blatantly removed to avoid real and appropriate vigorous scrutiny.”

The TVA claims that it has been open about its cleanup efforts by posting updates on its Web site. A U.S. magistrate judge has set a hearing on the issue for April 29th.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Residents ask judge to halt TVA’s cleanup efforts

Sen. Benjamin Cardin

The spill caught the attention of lawmakers and environmentalists alike, who are debating how such coal ash ponds should be regulated by the government after the disastrous coal ash spill at a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) plant in Kingston, Tennessee last December. That spill dumped more than a billion gallons of the toxic sludge onto a rural neighborhood, destroying homes and damaging property in its wake.

The TVA continues to clean up that mess, which could cost the utility between $525 million and $825 million. The effects on wildlife and humans are yet to be played. Coal ash may contain high concentrations of selenium, sulfate, arsenic, iron and manganese which can lead to serious health problems such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

Environmental activists and lawmakers are pushing the government to step up regulation of coal ash plants. In a letter to the Cumberland Times-News, Joy M. Oakes with the National Parks Conservation Association in Arlington, Virginia wrote, “There are about 300 coal waste storage sites in the U.S., many much larger than the ones operated by the New Page Corporation, which currently are not subject to any meaningful federal regulation. New regulations to manage coal waste must avert risks to our health, and the health of our national parks, so that our children and our grandchildren may continue to enjoy these treasured places.”

Sources:
MSNBC
Cumberland Times-News

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Senator asks for more regulation of coal-burning plants

President

According to Kentucky.com, “The Department of Energy will soon announce whether it will use $1 billion in stimulus funds to resurrect FutureGen, a proposal to create in Illinois the world’s first coal-fired power plant designed to capture and bury carbon emissions underground.” The Bush administration decided against building the plant because it would cost more than $1.8 billion. The Government Accountability Office says that price tag is more like $1.3 billion. Proponents of “clean coal” argue that  not building that plant put the effort back a decade.

Renewable resources are front-and-center with lawmakers these days, after a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal ash pond failed last December, dumping more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash sludge on to an east Tennessee community. Previously unregulated by the federal government, coal ash ponds and storage units will soon have to follow standards outlined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for regulating coal ash.

The economic stimulus plan has $3.4 billion for the coal industry, as opposed to $16.8 billion for renewable energy and efficiency programs. The Obama administration also is says it will implement a program that would cap companies’ carbon emissions.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Obama administration focuses on clean coal practices

As part of the campaign, protestors will march Saturday along Palm Canyon in Palm Springs and ask Congress to “quit coal and other fossil fuels and support a clean energy economy,” according to the report. “It is a major source of air and water pollution and leaves in its wake huge, toxic waste piles of ash.”

The protest comes two and a half months after the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston, Tennessee coal ash impoundment failed, dumping 2.2 million pounds of toxic coal ash on to 300 acres of property in rural east Tennessee. Coal ash contains toxins such as arsenic and lead, which contribute to serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Residents in the area already have reported experiencing breathing problems since the spill occurred.

The utility is shelling out a million dollars daily to clean up the mess, which destroyed homes and damaged property. Total cleanup costs are expected to ring in between $525 million and $825 million, according to the TVA. The utility also has vowed to convert the coal ash ponds at its Kingston plant to dry ash storage, which will take up to two years to complete.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Southern California communities march for safer alternatives to coal-burning

The spill originated from a small hole in one of NewPage Corp.’s pipelines that cross the Potomac. The leak began about 8 p.m. Sunday night and continued to leak until 6 a.m. Monday morning.

The spill is just a fraction of the size of the one caused when the Tennessee Valley Authority impoundment pond failed and oozed toxic coal ash into a rural Tennessee neighborhood and into the nearby Emory River. But Maryland state regulators are still concerned of the potential environmental problems the leak may cause.

Coal ash could contain high concentrations of selenium, sulfate, arsenic, iron and manganese, which can contribute to serious health problems such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. The Tennessee spill has already caused many locals to complain of respiratory problems, and a young child in the area recently tested positive for heavy metals.

The storage and disposal of coal ash is not currently regulated, but Environmental Protection Agency officials have vowed since the TVA spill to draft rules for coal ash storage and disposal.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › 4,000 gallons of coal ash pour into Potomac River

Homes were destroyed and property was damaged when the coal ash impoundment failed and poured on to the rural east Tennessee community. TVA announced that it plans to buy the damaged properties, including lakeside homes. It will also end wet-ash storage at the plant.

Other efforts include temporarily holding the recovered ash at the Kingston site to allow it to drain before sending it to landfills or possibly recycling it. Officials vow they will work to keep the fly ash from becoming airborne.

Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium that has been linked to serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. A survey of 368 residents living in the area of the spill found a third of them experienced breathing problems and half experienced increased stress and anxiety.

TVA estimates its cleanup efforts to total between $525 and $825 million before the land is restored.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA granted permission to dredge Emory River

Converting the coal ash ponds to dry ash storage will take about 18 to 24 months to complete. Meantime, TVA will continue working on cleaning up the mess made by the coal ash pond that failed. That cleanup effort is expected to ring in as high as $825 million. TVA has vowed to make the area affected by the spill “as good, if not better than before” the spill occurred. It also will continue to support regulators in the monitoring of water, soil and air.

TVA also is working with state Environment and Conservation for a safe way to remove the ash in the main channel of the Emory River. Once removed, that ash will be temporarily placed on a ball field and at another site at the Kingston plant.

The cleanup will be “developed and reviewed by an interagency team” including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Tennessee Department of Health, the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Roane County officials. TVA also is developing a community involvement cleanup plan.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA releases details of coal ash spill cleanup plan

The practice of utilities selling coal ash byproducts is not unusual. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) recently released a report stating that it sells about a third of the 7 million tons of fly ash, bottom ash, gypsum and boiler slag generated in its plants each year. Those byproducts have been mixed into concrete for roads in bridges and in blocks for buildings. The gypsum has been used in wallboard, granules for roofing shingles and grit for sandblasters. The byproducts even have been used as filler material for recreation areas, ball fields and industrial parks, according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

Yes, this is the same type of toxic material that spilled on to 300 acres of rural east Tennessee last December when one of the utility’s coal ash ponds failed, destroying nearby homes and causing hundreds of millions of damage to property. Environmentalists say the damage to wildlife and plant life is still to be determined, and many locals who live near the site have already suffered health problems. The coal ash contains toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been associated with serious health problems such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

So it comes as little surprise that the Chinese drywall containing coal ash byproducts is also making people sick. The lawsuit alleges that the drywall emits one of several sulfur compounds giving homes made of it a foul odor. Some say those fumes also may cause respiratory health problems, headaches, dry eyes and nosebleeds. The long term affects of exposure are yet to be determined.

Other problems caused by the Chinese drywall include corrosion of air condition coils, putting homes at serious risk for electrical fires.

The class action lawsuit names the Knauf Group, PKT’s parent company; Banner Supply, a Miami-based materials supply company; and Rothchilt International, Ltd. , an export company in China. Legal experts believe many more lawsuits will follow.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Coal ash byproducts used in building supplies making people sick

An Associated Press report found that there are 162 power plants in the county that have coal ash ponds. Those ponds store anywhere from 500 tons to 653,300 tons of coal ash. While coal ash has stayed somewhat below the environmental issues radar, its safety has come into question recently after the December 2008 spill in Kingston.

That spill fell on 300 acres of rural community, destroying houses, damaging property and pouring into nearby rivers. While cleanup efforts are underway, there is much debate surrounding the safety of the land, water and air. Coal ash contains dangerous toxins that can cause serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

The TVA spill has spurred environmental and industry officials in other parts of the country to take a closer look at coal ash ponds at other sites. According to the Gillette News Record report, industry officials in Wyoming say coal ash ponds there are not in jeopardy of leaking or spilling, adding that the TVA incident likely was the result of bad engineering and not the lack of federal regulation.

Despite the reassurance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has vowed to study the issue and decide whether regulation is necessary. Environmental groups continue to argue that regulating the giant toxic ponds are a must for human safety.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Officials in other states review safety of coal ash plants

We told you earlier about Penny Dodson and her 18-month-old grandson Evan. For 10 days after the spill, they stayed in their home instead of fleeing. She was told by TVA authorities that they would be safe. But when Evan started having trouble breathing, doctors tested him for heavy metals. The tests revealed that Evan had elevated levels of arsenic in his body, which doctors determined was from fly ash in the community. Penny is now guilt-stricken.

While no one was injured when the coal ash pond failed and dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic material on to 300 acres of a rural east Tennessee neighborhood, authorities want to be sure damages, such as those experienced by little Evan and by the property owners whose homes and property were affected, are kept to a minimum.

TVA has executed a massive clean up, building temporary dams in Emory River in hopes of keep the ash from flowing any father downstream, and laid grass seed to keep the coal ash from flying. Sludge is being scooped out of waterways and land. How long the cleanup will take is still unclear, but the price of getting the land livable again could cost TVA as much as $825 million.

The hearings continue this week with more testimony from victims as well as testimony from representatives of the TVA and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA coal ash victims testify about property, personal damages

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

“When I got the results I was horrified,” Penny said to News Channel 5. “It showed that Evan has increased levels of arsenic and lead and other heavy metal in his system. … They said that his problem was due to the airborne fly ash in the community. He was directly impacted, and we were told that we would have to leave the area.”

The toxic mud and sludge that poured on to the east Tennessee community destroying homes and damaging property in its wake, contained potential toxins such as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese. Problems associated with those materials include cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

Last week, TVA acknowledged that the spill was worse than initially reported, calling it a “catastrophe.” Lawmakers are looking into the cleanup efforts, which some are calling too slow. Those efforts include building temporary dams to stop the flow into neighboring bodies of water and dusting the area with grass seeds to keep the coal ash from becoming airborne. The cleanup could cost the utility as much as $825 million and the toll on wildlife and plant life – and ultimately, human life – is yet to be known. But some, like Penny, say the worst damage already has been done.

“I carry guilt because we stayed, because I was told that we were going to be safe, and I believed them, and it’s not true – we are not safe,” she said.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Toddler near coal ash spill site tests positive for heavy metal

“It was a catastrophe,” said Tom Kilgore, TVA president, referencing an internal memo that was obtained by the Associated Press that downplayed the incident by changing the description from “catastrophic” to “sudden, accidental.” The memo was also edited to remove references of a public health risk, instead choosing to call the spill an “acute threat” to fish.

The spill has caused heartache to both the TVA and residents in the area. When the December coal ash pond spilled over, it destroyed homes and damaged property. The environmental damage has yet to be determined. Several property owners have filed suit against the utility and just last week, TVA announced that its has cut incentive programs for all employees, including senior management. TVA also is facing mounting cleanup costs as much as $1 million a day, which is expected to total as high as $825 million. How it will pay for the cleanup is still unclear. TVA said after insurance payments are made it will consider options that include raising customers’ rates.

In an effort to improve its credibility and garner more respect from the communities in which it serves, TVA has hired an outside consultant to lead an investigation into the cause of the massive spill. The utility also is inspecting ash storage areas at its other coal-fired plants, in particular the coal ash ponds like that in Kingston that failed.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA calls coal ash spill disaster a ‘catastrophe’

The bleak outlook is in part the result of the utility’s coal ash pond failure in December that dumped 1.1 billion pounds of toxic waste on to 300 acres of east Tennessee. TVA is facing numerous lawsuits from property owners as well as mounting cleanup costs that could reach as high as $825 million.

TVA said insurance should cover some of the costs but it also will consider disposing assets, using debt and raising power rates. The slashing of its annual incentive awards will also help cover costs.

As a result, President and Executive Officer Tom Kilgore said not only will he and upper management not receive the annual incentive awards for the fiscal year, compensation adjustments and lump sums also would not be paid for the year. However, annual incentive pay tied to performance of individual units would remain in place.

“I know that in these tough economic times, this news will be disappointing to our employees, but it is a realization of the challenges we face. I am grateful to everyone for their understanding,” Kilgore said in the memo.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › TVA cuts incentive programs for all employees

The coal ash spill is being touted as the worst environmental disaster in TVA’s history. Not only were homes destroyed and property damaged by the massive outpour, the material that was dumped on to the land and flowed into the river contains dangerous toxins that could pose a possible health hazard not only to animals and plants in the area, but also to humans.

A massive cleanup is underway, ringing in at about $1 million per day. Estimates on the total cost of the cleanup could be as high as $825 million. Some environmentalists say it is almost impossible to completely rid the area of toxins, suggesting the spill site be converted to an independent educational and research center. However, TVA officials say they would rather continue to follow the cleanup plan rather than consider turning the damaged land into a research site.

While the proposed legislation is a step in the right direction, activists say it doesn’t solve the whole problem. “The issue of keen importance is fly ash needs to be regulated at the federal level as a hazardous waste,” said Sarah McCoin, a member of the newly formed Tennessee Coal Ash Survivors Network.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Congressional committee considers regulating coal ash ponds, landfills

The massive spill is considered one of the worst environmental disasters, destroying homes and damaging property. The toll on wildlife, plant life and, ultimately, human life, is yet to be determined. Cleanup efforts are expected to cost TVA between $525 million and $825 million depending on how many times the waste will have to be moved and how fast crews can dredge the Emory River.

How the utility will pay for cleaning up the mess is yet to be determined. TVA officials say insurance should cover some of the mounting costs, but other options may also need to be considered, such as disposing of assets, using debt and raising power rates. The latter option likely will come with some criticism.

Last fall the utility’s board approved a 20 percent electric rate hike – the highest in almost 20 years – due to escalating fuel costs. As a small tradeoff, TVA lowered its fuel charge by 6 percent in January and said it will cut another 7 percent effective April 1, resulting in a savings of about $4 to $9 in TVA residential customers’ power bills.

TVA provides electricity to about 8.8 million million customers in Tennessee and parts of Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia, according to the report.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Will customers have to pay for TVA’s coal ash disaster?

Coal ash contains toxins such as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese. These toxins have been associated with serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. When the coal ash spilled from the Kingston TVA plant, it poured over property and into nearby rivers. While the contaminants are being cleaned from the ground and waterways, some scientists worry that long term effects on wildlife and plant life could ultimately affect human life.

Indiana has 13 coal ash ponds in 13 different counties. The largest, containing nearly 900,000 tons of ash, is located in Gibson County. Gibson is located in the southwestern part of the state and has a population of about 35,000.

Indiana’s coal-fired power plants export about 24 percent of the electricity they generate. Environmentalists have raised concerns about the serious health concerns associated with coal combustion, including asthma, chronic bronchitis, lung cancer, stroke and sudden infant dath syndrome. According to the report, Indiana has the third highest emissions of sulfur dioxide, which has been strongly associated with human deaths.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Indianans worry about their coal ash impoundments

Late last December the TVA coal ash pond spilled over, dumping 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material on to 300 acres of a rural neighborhood in east Tennessee, destroying homes and damaging property in its wake. Temporary dams were built to halt the ash’s flow into neighboring rivers, and grass seeds have been spread on the ground to keep the sludge at bay. But experts still don’t know how long clean-up efforts will take or how the dangerous toxins might affect animals and humans there.

Scientists say that turning the spill site into a educational and research center for the study of long-term effects of coal ash on the environment “could yield scientific dividends that could be used at power plants around the world,” according to the story. Scientists also say that if the fly ash is stabilized, it shouldn’t pose a risk to the health and safety of researchers or residents in the area.

The TVA and the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation say despite the recommendation plans are to continue with clean-up efforts to remove the ash and restore the environment.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Scientists say spill site should be converted to research center

“I fear for my friends and all the people living below this coal sludge dam,” Gary Anderson, a resident who lives near the mountain site, told the media. “Blasting beside the dam, over underground mines, could decimate the valley for miles. The ‘experts’ said that the Buffalo Creek sludge dam was safe, but it failed. They said that the TVA sludge dam was safe, but it failed. Massey is setting up an even greater catastrophe here.”

The protest was manned by residents and organized by pan-Appalachian Mountain Justice and Climate Ground Zero. Organizations such as the Civil Society Institute and theCLEAN.org joined in on the fight. Those against the blasting are urging the mountaintop removal be replaced by a wind farm, arguing that a wind farm would provide more tax revenue and more jobs over time.

Experts worry that if the dam at Coal River Mountain experienced the same fate as the TVA coal ash pond in December, thousands more people could be affected and far more property destroyed.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › W Va residents worry that blasting could cause massive spill

In 2003 and 2006, two small leaks occurred at the Kingston plant, which raised the interest of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. That agency asked TVA to provide more information about the leaks but did not require a new storage system.

A TVA spokesman says the two smaller leaks were not related to December’s pond failure, and in both cases repairs were made to the ponds to stop the slow leaks. A 2008 inspection report of the Kingston ponds indicated that there were no structural problems with the ponds. However, officials say that the report indicated that TVA was irresponsible for not realizing that the previous spills pointed toward a serious stability problem.

Coal ash ponds are not regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because the EPA doesn’t consider the coal ash to be hazardous material. Federal agents oversee coal mines but don’t regulate the burning power plants. Some experts say states have done a poor job of monitoring the coal ash ponds.

Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen said he is working to provide stronger oversight of the coal ash ponds in his state. Other states where TVA has coal ash ponds or landfills include Alabama and Kentucky.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Previous leaks should have signaled warning

MONTGOMERY, ALA. – Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., is currently evaluating claims on behalf of property owners affected by a devastating coal ash spill in Tennessee. The disaster spilled thousands of pounds of coal ash and toxic waste across more than 300 acres. The event occurred when an earthen retaining wall at the Kingston Fossil Plant failed, creating one of the largest coal fly ash spills in the United States. The plant is located 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn.

Coal-fired power plants produce coal ash and other toxic waste byproducts. The waste contains such heavy metals as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese, which have been shown to cause cancer, liver damage, and neurological complications. The material is usually stored on site at the energy-production facilities in retention ponds or dams. A failure in the dam’s retaining wall, or an overflow, can result in an environmental disaster contaminating surrounding waterways, soil, and wildlife, and endangering human health and life.

There are coal ash retention ponds at nine locations in Alabama, including six coal-fired steam plants operated by Alabama Power Company. The Tennessee Valley Authority (T.V.A.), which operates the Tennessee plant that failed, also has two coal-fired plants in north Alabama that have ash retention ponds; and PowerSouth Energy Cooperative has a coal ash pond at Lowman Power Plant in southwest Alabama.

“Given that the Tennessee Valley Authority has similar ponds at its two coal-fired plants in Alabama, we hope that they are making certain that those ponds are sound so that we will not have another tragedy like the one at TVA’s Kingston Steam Plant,” said Rhon Jones, an attorney with Beasley Allen who specializes in Environmental law. “Residents and property owners near all nine coal ash retention ponds in Alabama are counting on these ponds to be safe and secure. No property owner should have to go through the disaster facing those persons in Tennessee near the Kingston Steam Plant.”

According to Alabama’s Department of Environmental Management, all nine coal-fired power plants in Alabama were inspected following the Tennessee disaster, and all passed inspection with no problems. However, there is some debate about how coal ash is stored and regulated. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not regulate these types of retention ponds or the materials contained in them. Surprisingly, the EPA does not consider the coal ash hazardous material. There is a great deal of debate over whether state regulations are sufficient to regulate these retention ponds, as evidenced by this most recent disaster. For the greatest protection to the public, we recommend coal ash should be buried in lined landfills rather than retention ponds or dams, to prevent it from leaking out and contaminating waterways, groundwater and soil.

SOURCE: Beasley Allen Press Release

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Beasley Allen evaluating claims resulting from Tennessee coal-ash spill disaster, eyeing safety of Alabama plants