“You might have seen my picture in the paper,” she smiles at the video camera. John L. Wathen, a.k.a. Hurricane Creekkeeper, is shooting the video to capture community reaction to local government’s decision to store toxic coal ash in the nearby Arrowhead Landfill. That coal ash is recovered from the Emory River where more than a billion gallons of the toxic material spilled in December 2008 from a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal-firing plant in east Tennessee.

As part of a years-long, billion-dollar cleanup of the area, the TVA is hauling truckloads of the recovered coal ash from the river to the landfill in Perry County, an impoverished and historically black community in rural Alabama.

Local government calls the deal a “boon to the community.” It is expected to bring more than $3 million in “host fees” plus generate a few dozen jobs. Locals worry that they will have to shoulder the burden while city and county officials rake in the benefits.

“Sometimes at night when I’m in my bed I have my window cracked a little bit for some fresh air to keep from running the fan. I pick up this odor,” Ms. Ruby says. “I really don’ t want to say what it smell like. Some kind of gas. And it’s a bad scent … It wakes me up and it gets all through my house.

“I am concerned about my health. I’m breathing this stuff.”

Ms. Ruby and her neighbors worry their concerns are falling on deaf ears. But they aren’t the only ones who fear their health is in jeopardy. The recovered coal ash from Tennessee is being dumped into the Arrowhead Landfill and combined with household garbage. The liquid that drains from that landfill, also known as leachate, is trucked to nearby Marion, where it is then dumped into an open sewer lagoon and combined with sewage.

“The stench is horrible,” Wathen points out in his video. “Citizens nearby both locations fear for their health and safety.”

Watch Ms. Ruby’s and residents’ reactions.

Click here to view the embedded video.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Perry County residents voice concerns about coal ash storage

Coal ash is not classified as a hazardous material and thus did not fall under federal regulations, but that changed in December 2008 when an impoundment pond at the east Tennessee TVA plant breached. The EPA has spent the past year inspecting coal ash storage facilities and utilities throughout the country and developing guidelines for safe storage. Those guidelines were expected to be announced by the end of 2009, but the EPA said it needed more time. That extra time may help the EPA identify and close loopholes that would otherwise leave customers of those plants footing the bill for any problems that arise.

The east Tennessee coal ash spill is a prime example. That disaster sent more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring community. The TVA is expected to spend more than a billion dollars over three years cleaning up that mess. Who is footing the cost of that cleanup? Millions of TVA customers every month in their utility bills.

TVA will soon begin negotiating with insurance companies, hoping to offset the cost of the spill for its customers. According to the South Carolina Post and Courier, many industries that handle hazardous materials must obtain bonds and other forms of insurance to cover potential toxic waste cleanups; however, power plants, chemical manufacturers and oil refineries in many cases were excluded from these requirements.

With any luck, when the EPA unveils its proposed guidelines, plants that store toxic materials will be required to hold money aside for such disasters so that their customers don’t have to pay for their problems.

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › EPA guidelines may require coal-firing plants to plan for disasters

The company agrees the groundwater is polluted, but says it is not responsible for the contamination. “San Juan Coal Company is confident that allegations of water contamination as a result of coal combustion by-product (CCB ) placement at the San Juan Mine are incorrect and are not supported by water monitoring data,” Charles Roybal, senior counsel for the coal company’s parent company, BHP Billiton, told The Independent.

Skirting responsibility for such environmental disasters is not uncommon among coal-firing plants. Last year, a coal ash impoundment pond at the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston, Tenn., plant breached, sending a wave of toxic material onto 300 acres of a rural community. The massive 1.1 billion gallon spill is listed as one of the largest – if not the largest – environmental disaster in U.S. history.

The TVA is engaged in a 3-year, $1 billion cleanup of the land in Tennessee, but critics worry the world’s largest utility could avoid many of the fines and penalties because a Department of Justice position on the issue shelters the agency from civil penalties in suits brought by citizen groups under some federal environmental statues.

Perhaps San Juan Mine is looking for the same “out.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Environmentalists to sue NM coal mine for contaminating groundwater

Turner testified at a congressional hearing last week about the coal ash cleanup and storage. Also testifying was TVA CEO Tom Kilgore, who said the nation’s largest utility will spend about $1 billion to improve coal ash storage facilities and convert wet storage to dry storage, considered a safer alternative.

The TVA is already shelling about $1.2 billion to clean up the mess it left when its impoundment pond breached, a process estimated to take about three years to complete. It also gave more than $40 million to Roane County, Tenn., to pay for upgrades to the city’s utilities and roads as well as fund a massive public relations campaign aimed at improving the city’s image following the spill.

But not everyone is sharing Turner’s excitement about the presence of recovered coal ash in Perry County. Environmentalist groups are accusing the TVA of using the impoverished county as a dumping ground for its toxic waste. Residents are also concerned about the threat of toxins leaching through the soil and contaminating ground water. Their voices are muted by those in power, like Turner, who last week told the TVA, “I say thank you, and send us some more.”

Source: Knox News

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › Turner calls coal ash storage a ‘godsend’

Several years ago coal ash from power plants was given a non-hazardous rating. Since then, technology has improved the quality of the smoke released into the air from coal-firing plants. The toxins that used to escape into the air are now kept in the ash left behind. Tests have shown that coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.

Environmentalists have tried over the years to have coal ash reclassified as a hazardous material, but little was done to push that effort until last year when a coal impoundment pond in east Tennessee breached, sending a massive wave of coal ash on to a neighboring community. The 1.1 billion gallons that spilled out toppled houses, destroyed property and contaminated the nearby Emory River. Several residents were displaced, but it is the health risk that concerns many of the people affected by the spill. Some have reported respiratory problems and heightened anxiety. Others, including a young child, have tested positive for heavy metal in their bloodstream.

Environmentalists and activists are urging the EPA to carefully consider how it will categorize both wet and dry coal ash impoundments. “Both pose a threat to human health and the environment so it doesn’t make sense to create that dichotomy (between wet and dry ash storage regulation),” said Lisa Evans, an attorney with Earthjustice, in an interview with the Tennessean.“We would not think that would be a protective scheme, with the many cases where dry disposal has caused contamination of groundwater and surface water.”

SOURCE: Coal Ash Spill › EPA considers hazardous material classification of coal ash