<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coal Ash Spill &#187; Environmental Integrity Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/environmental-integrity-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Coal ash spill worse than originally thought</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/08/coal-ash-spill-worse-than-originally-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/08/coal-ash-spill-worse-than-originally-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schaeffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Environment Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=1233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The December 2008 coal ash spill from a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) power plant in Kingston, Tenn., was already considered one of the nation’s largest environmental disasters, but one year after the spill, authorities say the devastation is even bigger than first imagined. Eric Schaeffer, executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project, tells The Environment [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/08/coal-ash-spill-worse-than-originally-thought/">Coal ash spill worse than originally thought</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2008/12/coal-ash-spill-31.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-60" title="Neighborhood Flooded" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2008/12/coal-ash-spill-31-150x150.jpg" alt="coal ash spill 31 150x150 Coal ash spill worse than originally thought" width="100" height="100" /></a>The December 2008 <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill</strong> from a <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong>power plant in Kingston, Tenn., was already considered one of the nation’s largest environmental disasters, but one year after the spill, authorities say the devastation is even bigger than first imagined. <strong>Eric Schaeffer</strong>, executive director of the <strong>Environmental Integrity Project,</strong> tells <a href="http://www.environmentreport.org/show.php?showID=331">The Environment Report’s</a> Tanya Ott that the 2.6 billion pounds of toxic sludge from the east Tennessee impoundment pond is more than the total discharge of all United States power plants last year.<span id="more-1233"></span></p>
<p>The spill, which piled as high as nine feet in some areas, knocked houses off their foundations, blanketed yards, and poured into the Emory River. Coal ash is laden with toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to <strong>serious health problems</strong> such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. It&#8217;s also “notoriously difficult to clean up,” Schaeffer says. The TVA is making efforts, though, spending as much as three years and upwards of a billion dollars to clean up the land and waterways.</p>
<p>Despite its dangerous and toxic contents, coal ash is not classified as a hazardous material and does not fall under government regulations. That is expected to change soon, as over the past year the <strong>Environmental Protection Agency</strong> has been charged with inspecting all coal-firing plants in the country and developing safety and storage guidelines. Those guidelines were promised before the end of the year, but late last month the agency said it would need more time to issue guidelines, saying it hopes to have a proposal ready in the first few weeks of 2010.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/08/coal-ash-spill-worse-than-originally-thought/">Coal ash spill worse than originally thought</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/08/coal-ash-spill-worse-than-originally-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2008/12/coal-ash-spill-31-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2008/12/coal-ash-spill-31.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Neighborhood Flooded</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2008/12/coal-ash-spill-31-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmentalist groups want TVA to be prosecuted, fined</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/16/environmentalist-groups-want-tva-to-be-prosecuted-fined/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/16/environmentalist-groups-want-tva-to-be-prosecuted-fined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-firing plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mismanagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polluters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) should be prosecuted and penalized for not ensuring the safety of its Kingston, Tenn., coal ash impoundment pond to prevent it from breaking and spilling a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring rural community, according to angry environmental groups. But a long-standing federal rule that limits [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/16/environmentalist-groups-want-tva-to-be-prosecuted-fined/">Environmentalist groups want TVA to be prosecuted, fined</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong>should be prosecuted and penalized for not ensuring the safety of its Kingston, Tenn., <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> impoundment pond</strong> to prevent it from breaking and spilling a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring rural community, according to angry environmental groups. But a long-standing federal rule that limits how the Justice Department can prosecute federal agencies could protect the nation’s largest utility from paying its fair dues.<span id="more-1144"></span></p>
<p>“No corporation or agency should be above the law, especially at the expense of the environmental well-being of our citizens, wildlife and waters,” said Robert Dreher, senior vice president for conservation law and climate change at Defenders of Wildlife, one of the environmental groups outraged by the notion that the TVA may skirt fines and charges because of the law.</p>
<p>TVA officials say the allegations are unfounded, as they are already subject to penalties and <strong>lawsuits</strong> filed by citizen groups and the <strong>Environmental Protection Agency</strong>. TVA also is taking measures to change the way it stores coal ash by converting its wet ash ponds to dry storage.</p>
<p>The <strong>Environmental Integrity Project</strong>, one of the environmental groups leading the fight against the TVA, says the utility is one of the nation’s <strong>worst polluters</strong> and displays the “latest and most dramatic example of <strong>environmental mismanagement</strong>.” The group sent a letter to <strong>President Barack Obama</strong> urging him to have the Justice Department stop protecting the TVA from penalties. The group also recommended that Obama appoint new directors to TVA’s governing board and order the utility to establish a timeline for its plan to convert its wet storage to dry and phase out old <strong>coal-firing plants</strong>.</p>
<p><em>Sources:<br />
</em> <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j66XeOh7UZ03on0IcFGHsvatUplwD9CJPNU00"><em>Associated Press</em></a><em><br />
</em> <a href="http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/dec/14/tennessee-environmental-groups-want-obama-prosecut/?breakingnews"><em>Chattanooga Times Free Press</em></a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/16/environmentalist-groups-want-tva-to-be-prosecuted-fined/">Environmentalist groups want TVA to be prosecuted, fined</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/16/environmentalist-groups-want-tva-to-be-prosecuted-fined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental groups file intent to sue notice against EPA</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/22/environmental-groups-file-intent-to-sue-notice-against-epa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/22/environmental-groups-file-intent-to-sue-notice-against-epa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defenders of Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal regulations on coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic discharges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three environmental groups have filed a notice of intent to sue against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for not limiting toxic discharges from coal power plants or revising any of its effluent standards for coal combustion products or other effluents since 1982. The threat of a lawsuit, filed by the Defenders of Wildlife, the Sierra [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/22/environmental-groups-file-intent-to-sue-notice-against-epa/">Environmental groups file intent to sue notice against EPA</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-376" title="epa" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" alt="epa 150x150 Environmental groups file intent to sue notice against EPA" width="100" height="100" /></a>Three environmental groups have filed a <strong>notice of intent to sue</strong> against the <strong>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) </strong>for not limiting <strong>toxic discharges</strong> from coal power plants or revising any of its effluent standards for coal combustion products or other effluents since 1982.</p>
<p>The threat of a lawsuit, filed by the <strong>Defenders of Wildlife</strong>, the <strong>Sierra Club</strong>, and the <strong>Environmental Integrity Project</strong>, comes as part of the wave of criticism on how <strong>coal-firing plants</strong> are regulated. That debate was spurred by last year’s <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill in Kingston, Tenn. <strong>Coal ash</strong>, which is produced and stored at coal-firing plants, is not listed as a hazardous material and thus did not fall under federal regulations. However, improvements in pollution controls have kept toxins from leaving smokestacks, thus increasing the amount of toxins in the coal ash.<span id="more-892"></span></p>
<p><strong>Coal ash</strong> has since been found to contains <strong>dangerous toxins</strong> including arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been associated with serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.</p>
<p>“Toxic discharges from power plants can threaten the health of local communities, contaminate ground and surface waters and destroy aquatic life,” said Eric Schaeffer, executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project, in the <a href="http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2009/sep/14/groups-vow-sue-epa-over-coal-ash-delays/?breakingnews">Times Free Press</a>.  “EPA should have limited these discharges decades ago as the law requires. EPA needs to stop kicking the can down the road and set a date for <strong>regulation</strong>.”</p>
<p>The EPA has pledged to issue federal regulations by the end of the year.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/22/environmental-groups-file-intent-to-sue-notice-against-epa/">Environmental groups file intent to sue notice against EPA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/22/environmental-groups-file-intent-to-sue-notice-against-epa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">epa</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Cancer risk &#8216;disturbingly&#8217; higher near coal ash ponds</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/11/study-cancer-risk-disturbingly-higher-near-coal-ash-ponds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/11/study-cancer-risk-disturbingly-higher-near-coal-ash-ponds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earthjustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancer rates among people living near coal ash ponds are “disturbingly high,” according to Environmental Integrity Project and Earthjustice, nonprofit organizations that studied Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data from 210 coal ash ponds across the United States. The data is compiled in a report titled, “Coming Clean: What EPA Knows About the Dangers of Coal [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/11/study-cancer-risk-disturbingly-higher-near-coal-ash-ponds/">Study: Cancer risk &#8216;disturbingly&#8217; higher near coal ash ponds</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> <img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-571" title="eip-logo" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/05/eip-logo-100x100.jpg" alt="eip logo 100x100 Study: Cancer risk disturbingly higher near coal ash ponds" width="100" height="100" />Cancer rates</strong> among people living near <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> ponds are “disturbingly high,” according <strong>to </strong><a href="http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/pubs/May%207,%202009%20EIP%20EJ%20National%20News%20Release.pdf"><strong>Environmental Integrity Project </strong>and<strong> Earthjustice</strong></a>, nonprofit organizations that studied <strong>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)</strong> data from 210 coal ash ponds across the United States. The data is compiled in a report titled, <em>“Coming Clean: What EPA Knows About the Dangers of Coal Ash.”<span id="more-565"></span></em></p>
<p>The EPA screening study conducted in 2002 was not made public until March 4, 2009. Numerous attempts to get the information made public through the <strong>Freedom of Information Act</strong> to the EPA during the Bush Administration were denied or released with the risk estimates blacked out. The data finally made public after seven years shows that cancer risk is substantially higher for up to one out of every 50 Americans living near wet ponds used to dispose of ash and scrubber sludge from coal-fired power plants across the United States.</p>
<p>The analysis focuses on 100 landfills and 110 surface impoundments examined by the EPA that lack effective synthetic liners to prevent leaks as the EPA found unlined and clay-lined waste units present far greater risks to both human health and ecosystems. These high-risk coal ash dump sites are in more than 35 states.</p>
<p>According to the report: “Can living next to one of these dumpsites increase your risk of getting cancer or other diseases? The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) thinks so, especially if you live near one of those wet ash ponds, or surface impoundments, that dot the landscape near large coal plants, the pond has no protective liner, and you get your drinking water from a well … (N)earby residents have as much as a <strong>1 in 50 chance of getting cancer</strong> from drinking water contaminated by arsenic, one of the most common, and most dangerous, pollutants from coal ash. And that’s not all. That same risk assessment says that living near ash ponds increases the risk of damage to the liver, kidney, lungs and other organs as a result of being exposed to toxic metals like cadmium, cobalt, lead, and other pollutants at concentrations far above levels that are considered safe. In addition, the danger to wildlife and ecosystems is simply off the charts, with one contaminant—boron—expected to leach into the environment at levels two thousand times thresholds generally considered to be safe.”</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/11/study-cancer-risk-disturbingly-higher-near-coal-ash-ponds/">Study: Cancer risk &#8216;disturbingly&#8217; higher near coal ash ponds</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/11/study-cancer-risk-disturbingly-higher-near-coal-ash-ponds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/05/eip-logo-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/05/eip-logo.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">eip-logo</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/05/eip-logo-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ash ponds at two Birmingham coal facilities top list for arsenic</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report published today by the Birmingham News says the coal ash retaining ponds at two Birmingham-area coal-fired energy plants contain the highest levels of arsenic in the country, ranked and Nos. 2 and 3 on a list compiled by the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP). The study evaluates the amount of ash deposited in on-site [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/">Ash ponds at two Birmingham coal facilities top list for arsenic</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report published today by the <a href="http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/statebriefs.ssf?/base/news/123140611354130.xml&amp;coll=2&amp;thispage=1">Birmingham News</a> says the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> retaining ponds</strong> at two Birmingham-area coal-fired energy plants contain the <strong>highest levels of arsenic </strong>in the country, ranked and Nos. 2 and 3 on a list compiled by the <a href="http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/">Environmental Integrity Project (EIP)</a>. The study evaluates the amount of ash deposited in on-site ash ponds and landfills from 2000-2006, according to the News report.<span id="more-97"></span></p>
<p>The EIP released the report, titled &#8220;<strong>Disaster in Waiting</strong>: Toxic Coal Ash Disposal in Impoundments at Power Plants&#8221; yesterday. The report says U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data shows power plants are disposing of high volumes of <strong>toxic metals</strong> in open lagoons.</p>
<p>There is a lot of attention on this issue now, following a December 22, 2008 disaster when the retaining wall at a coal-fired electric plant in Kingston, Tennessee, failed, dumping more than 1 billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> and other waste over 300 acres in East Tennessee. The event is being called the worst <strong>environmental disaster</strong> since the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p>
<p>But the Tennessee disaster is just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to its official report, which listed Birmingham-area facilities Gaston Steam Plant in Shelby County and Gorgas Steam Plant in Walker County at No. 2 and 3, the EIP issued a press release stating that other <strong>toxic coal pollution dumps</strong> around the United States pose a <strong>greater potential danger</strong> than the Tennessee <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a></strong> disaster site.</p>
<p>According to the release, at least 13 states have three or more under-regulated &#8220;wet dumps&#8221; on the &#8220;Worst Of&#8221; list for <strong>toxic chemicals</strong>. One coal pollution dump in Orlando, Fla., is reported to have TEN TIMES more arsenic than the Tennesee disaster site.</p>
<p>The release says the Tennessee facility was found on five of the six <strong>toxic chemical</strong> lists for the 50 worst coal-fired power plant pollution &#8220;wet dumps.&#8221;</p>
<p>EIP evaluations were based on industry-reported data collected by the EPA Toxic Reporting Inventory (TRI) data system for 2000-2006. EIP looked at the presence of arsenic, chromium, lead, nickel, selenium and thallium in the waste at Tennessee-style <strong>pollution dumping sites</strong> across the nation.</p>
<p>Eric Schaeffer, director of the Environmental Integrity Project, says, &#8220;The Tennessee eco-disaster has cast a spotlight on what is a very serious national problem &#8211; the existence of under-regulated <strong>toxic pollution coal dump sites</strong> near coal-fired pwoer plants that pose a serious threat to drinking water supplies, rivers and streams.&#8221; He said the Tennessee disaster is a warning sign of more trouble to come.</p>
<p>The EIP is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for more effective enforcement of environmental laws. Read the full news release and official report:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/eip-news-release1.pdf">EIP News Release</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/eip-report-disaster-in-waiting1.pdf">EIP Report: Disaster in Waiting</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/">Ash ponds at two Birmingham coal facilities top list for arsenic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

