<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coal Ash Spill &#187; federal regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/federal-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Advisory board recommends tougher controls over coal ash storage</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/03/advisory-board-recommends-tougher-controls-over-coal-ash-storage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/03/advisory-board-recommends-tougher-controls-over-coal-ash-storage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dam Safety Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wet ash storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Tennessee state advisory board is calling for tougher regulation of coal ash impoundment ponds and recommending that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) turn over control of its storage ponds to the Dam Safety Group, according to WRAL. The board, which formed in the wake of last year’s massive coal ash spill from the Kingston, [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/03/advisory-board-recommends-tougher-controls-over-coal-ash-storage/">Advisory board recommends tougher controls over coal ash storage</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/12/tennessee-seal.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1092" title="tennessee-seal" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/12/tennessee-seal-100x100.jpg" alt="tennessee seal 100x100 Advisory board recommends tougher controls over coal ash storage " width="100" height="100" /></a>A Tennessee state advisory board is calling for tougher <strong>regulation of <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> impoundment ponds</strong> and recommending that the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> turn over control of its storage ponds to the <strong>Dam Safety Group</strong>, according to <a href="http://www.wral.com/news/state/story/6534008/">WRAL</a>. The board, which formed in the wake of last year’s massive <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a> from the Kingston, Tenn., TVA plant, released a report this week outlining its recommendations. The board also recommended that an independent board oversee the design, construction and closure of ash retention ponds.<span id="more-1077"></span></p>
<p>Barbara Martocci, TVA spokeswoman, said the Dam Safety Group will take over the inspection of all the utility’s impoundments in 2011. And the utility is also taking steps to eliminate <strong>wet ash storage</strong> facilities at all its power plant locations.</p>
<p>Coal ash storage ponds have come under scrutiny since December 2008, when a coal ash impoundment pond at the TVA Kingston plant breached, sending a wave of toxic material on to a neighboring rural community.</p>
<p>Despite containing heavy metals that have been linked to serious health problems, coal ash isn’t classified as a <strong>hazardous material</strong>. Thus, facilities that store coal ash weren’t regulated by the federal government. Critics say that if the plants had been properly regulated and inspected, perhaps the massive spill that blanked an east Tennessee community with toxic material may not have happened in the first place.</p>
<p>The TVA, meanwhile, is involved in a years-long, multi-million dollar cleanup of the land and is facing a mountain of <strong>lawsuits</strong> from people who were harmed or lost property in the coal ash disaster. The customers of the nation’s largest utility will soon feel the pain, too, as that hefty expense is likely to translate into higher residential utility bills.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/03/advisory-board-recommends-tougher-controls-over-coal-ash-storage/">Advisory board recommends tougher controls over coal ash storage</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/12/03/advisory-board-recommends-tougher-controls-over-coal-ash-storage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/12/tennessee-seal-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/12/tennessee-seal.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tennessee-seal</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/12/tennessee-seal-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activists fight coal ash pond expansion along Ohio River</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/11/05/activists-fight-coal-ash-pond-expansion-along-ohio-river/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/11/05/activists-fight-coal-ash-pond-expansion-along-ohio-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contaminated drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Division of Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG and E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerned citizens and environmental activists are opposing plans to expand a coal ash pond along the Ohio River in northern Kentucky because they say if the pond ruptures, it could contaminate drinking water. The proposal from LG&#38;E would build 100-foot-tall walls around an existing coal ash pond, giving it more capacity than the coal ash [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/11/05/activists-fight-coal-ash-pond-expansion-along-ohio-river/">Activists fight coal ash pond expansion along Ohio River</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerned citizens and environmental activists are opposing plans to expand a <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> pond</strong> along the <strong>Ohio River</strong> in northern <strong>Kentucky</strong> because they say if the pond ruptures, it could contaminate drinking water. The proposal from <strong>LG&amp;E</strong> would build 100-foot-tall walls around an existing coal ash pond, giving it more capacity than the coal ash impoundment at the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> Kingston, Tenn., plant, which failed last year and dumped more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic waste</strong> on to a neighboring community.</p>
<p>That spill, called one of the <strong>largest environmental disasters</strong> in U.S. history, knocked houses off their foundations, damaged property and contaminated waterways. The TVA is currently undergoing an estimated three-year, $1.2 billion cleanup effort to restore the land.<span id="more-1025"></span></p>
<p>That’s just the kind of nightmare Kentucky residents don’t want to experience. A major spill from a larger coal ash pond built on the Ohio River flood plain could easily contaminate Louisville’s drinking water uptake just 30 miles downstream.</p>
<p>LG&amp;E and <strong>Kentucky Division of Water</strong> officials say the pond wouldn’t affect the drinking water. But environmentalists have concerns. Coal ash is not categorized as a <strong>hazardous material</strong> and thus does not currently fall under <strong>federal regulation</strong>. But the massive Tennessee spill shed new light on coal ash.</p>
<p>Tests have shown that coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been linked to serious health conditions such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. As a result of last year’s devastating spill, the <strong>Environmental Protection Agency</strong> has been ordered to review all coal ash ponds in the country. The agency is expected to issue new rules for handling coal ash sometime in December.</p>
<p><em>Source: </em><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-ky-coalash,0,7480176.story"><em>Chicago Tribune</em></a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/11/05/activists-fight-coal-ash-pond-expansion-along-ohio-river/">Activists fight coal ash pond expansion along Ohio River</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/11/05/activists-fight-coal-ash-pond-expansion-along-ohio-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

