<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coal Ash Spill &#187; Kingston Fossil Plant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/kingston-fossil-plant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PR firm to use social media to improve image damaged by coal ash spill</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/27/pr-firm-to-use-social-media-to-improve-image-damaged-by-coal-ash-spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/27/pr-firm-to-use-social-media-to-improve-image-damaged-by-coal-ash-spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blurbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McNeely Pigott and Fox Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nashville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public relations firm that will likely handle the three-year, $1.9 million image campaign for Kingston, Tennessee, will use social media to improve the area’s tarnished reputation, according to WATE-TV. McNeely Pigott &#38; Fox Public Relations LLC, which submitted a proposal and budget for the campaign, would use social media techniques such as blogs, blurbs [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/27/pr-firm-to-use-social-media-to-improve-image-damaged-by-coal-ash-spill/">PR firm to use social media to improve image damaged by coal ash spill</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public relations firm that will likely handle the three-year, $1.9 million image campaign for Kingston, Tennessee, will use <strong>social media</strong> to improve the area’s tarnished reputation, according to <a href="http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=10416328&amp;nav=0RYv">WATE-TV</a>.</p>
<p><strong>McNeely Pigott &amp; Fox Public Relations LLC</strong>, which submitted a proposal and budget for the campaign, would use <strong>social media techniques</strong> such as <strong>blogs, blurbs </strong>and<strong> Twitter Tweets</strong> to highlight the positive side of Kingston.<span id="more-606"></span></p>
<p>The Nashville, Tennessee, firm’s budget also includes a two-year advertising campaign; a two-year, $726,000-per-year “news bureau;” and tracking data to gauge success. TVA officials “agreed in principal” that they would pay for the campaign.</p>
<p><strong>Kingston Mayor Troy Beets</strong> hopes the campaign will restore the luster of the area. “This is the most beautiful municipal lakefront in the state of Tennessee,” he said.</p>
<p>Last December, an impoundment pond at the TVA’s Kingston fossil plant was breached, sending 1.1 billion gallons of <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> on to 300 acres of that pristine lakefront community. The wave of toxic material knocked houses from their foundations and destroyed property in its wake.</p>
<p>Coal ash contains <strong>dangerous toxins</strong> such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which has been associated with <strong>health problems</strong> such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Since the spill, the TVA has been involved in a massive cleanup effort that could cost the utility as much as $975 million before it is complete.</p>
<p>For now, the area is overrun with cleanup crews, blocking streets and creating constant racket – a far cry from the area that once was a destination for water sports and recreation.</p>
<p>“This is the image that we need to project,” Mayor Beets said. “Kingston is whole. There is nothing wrong with our water supply here. There is nothing wrong with putting your boat in at Kingston.”</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/27/pr-firm-to-use-social-media-to-improve-image-damaged-by-coal-ash-spill/">PR firm to use social media to improve image damaged by coal ash spill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/27/pr-firm-to-use-social-media-to-improve-image-damaged-by-coal-ash-spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVA asked to pay for PR campaign to improve image of damaged area</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/26/tva-asked-to-pay-for-pr-campaign-to-improve-image-of-damaged-area/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/26/tva-asked-to-pay-for-pr-campaign-to-improve-image-of-damaged-area/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McNeely Pigott and Fox Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is being asked to cover the cost of a three-year, $1.9 million public relations campaign aimed at improving the image of Kingston, Tennessee. The nation’s largest public utility is being blamed for tarnishing the region’s reputation. Once thought of as a destination for water sports and recreation, the east Tennessee [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/26/tva-asked-to-pay-for-pr-campaign-to-improve-image-of-damaged-area/">TVA asked to pay for PR campaign to improve image of damaged area</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> is being asked to cover the cost of a three-year, $1.9 million <strong>public relations campaign</strong> aimed at <strong>improving the image of Kingston, Tennessee</strong>. The nation’s largest public utility is being blamed for tarnishing the region’s reputation. Once thought of as a destination for water sports and recreation, the east Tennessee community, which includes parts of the <strong>Emory River</strong>, is now covered in a mass of toxic debris that locals feel may cause them serious illness.<span id="more-602"></span></p>
<p><strong> McNeely Pigott &amp; Fox Public Relations LLC</strong> submitted a proposal and budget, which includes a two-year advertising campaign; a two-year, $726,000-per-year “news bureau;” and tracking data to gauge success. TVA officials “agreed in principal” that they would pay for the campaign.</p>
<p>“I hope they will focus on repairing our damaged image,” said Kingston Mayor Troy Beets.</p>
<p>Last December, an impoundment pond at the TVA’s Kingston fossil plant was breached, sending 1.1 billion gallons of <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> on to 300 acres of an east Tennessee community. The material stacked as high as nine feet in some areas, knocked houses from their foundations and destroyed property and waterways in its path.</p>
<p>Coal ash contains <strong>dangerous toxins</strong> such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been associated with <strong>serious health problems</strong> such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Since the spill, the TVA has been involved in a massive cleanup effort that could cost the utility as much as $975 million before it is complete.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/may/23/roane-pr-deal-will-be-19m/&lt;br &gt;&lt;/a&gt;">Knox News</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/26/tva-asked-to-pay-for-pr-campaign-to-improve-image-of-damaged-area/">TVA asked to pay for PR campaign to improve image of damaged area</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/26/tva-asked-to-pay-for-pr-campaign-to-improve-image-of-damaged-area/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coal ash disaster affects those not directly affected by spill</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/14/coal-ash-disaster-affects-those-not-directly-affected-by-spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/14/coal-ash-disaster-affects-those-not-directly-affected-by-spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasley Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breathing problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-firing plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhon Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rohn Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents of east Tennessee probably thought little of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal-firing plant in Kingston, or the toxic brew of coal ash that had been brimming in an impoundment pond for years. But as residents built homes on property just miles away and fished and boated in the Emory River that snaked nearby, [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/14/coal-ash-disaster-affects-those-not-directly-affected-by-spill/">Coal ash disaster affects those not directly affected by spill</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Residents of east Tennessee probably thought little of the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> coal-firing plant in Kingston, or the toxic brew of <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> that had been brimming in an impoundment pond for years. But as residents built homes on property just miles away and fished and boated in the <strong>Emory River</strong> that snaked nearby, the pond walls were beginning to seep and were showing erosion scarring in some areas.<span id="more-497"></span></p>
<p>Yet, an October 2008 inspection deemed the <strong>Kingston Fossil Plant</strong> structurally sound. And life went on as normal for the residents of Kingston. Until December 22, 2008, when the walls of the impoundment pond broke down and poured 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material on to 300 acres of property and into the Emory River.</p>
<p>“The <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a> has both immediate and long-term impacts for Kingston residents whose land and homes have been affected by the spill,” says <strong><a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/rhon-jones/">Rhon Jones</a>, Toxic Torts Section Head</strong> with <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com"><strong><a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen Law Firm</a></strong></a>. As the sludge poured out from the impoundment pond as high as nine feet tall in some areas, it destroyed multiple homes and knocked some completely off their foundations. Several homes were left uninhabitable. “Aside from the immediate impacts of losing one’s home and use of property, other impacts include diminished property values and increased health risks,” Jones says.</p>
<p>The toxins found in coal ash include arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese, and barium. According to news reports, potential health problems associated with these toxic substances include cancer, liver damage and neurological complications, among other health problems.</p>
<p>While cleanup efforts are underway, there is little to stop the dust particles that fly into the air as the sludge dries, which is likely to aggravate the problem, <strong>Jones</strong> adds.</p>
<p>“In a recent public meeting with Kingston residents, health officials warned that the dust associated with the spill will pose an increasing challenge as the slurry dries and spring winds arrive,” he says. The fine particulate matter also is linked to respiratory illness. “There are reports of residents complaining of increased illness already,” <strong>Jones</strong> says. “A recent survey by the Tennessee Department of Health found that one-third of residents living near the spill reported breathing problems and one-half reported increased stress and anxiety.”</p>
<p>Those dust particles may also pose a threat to individuals living farther away from the spill site. “From diminished property value to loss of recreational opportunities, residents throughout the Kingston area are affected by the spill regardless of whether their property suffered directly,” Jones says. “Property values may be diminished due to the proximity of the spill. Dust particles may blow into surrounding areas as the sludge dries. Clean-up activities will be disruptive to the area, because the enormous task of cleaning up the spill is similar to a massive construction project. Dredging of the Emory River began in March, and crews are working 20 hours a day. The clean-up involves trucking the dredged sludge to a yet determined location, and the truck traffic not only will be noisy but also has the potential to spread dust along the travel route.”</p>
<p>Recreational opportunities may be lost due to the dredging activities, because fishing, swimming, and other recreation near the site are no longer appealing, he adds. “The impact of the spill will be long-lasting and the entire community will be affected either directly or indirectly.”</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/14/coal-ash-disaster-affects-those-not-directly-affected-by-spill/">Coal ash disaster affects those not directly affected by spill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/14/coal-ash-disaster-affects-those-not-directly-affected-by-spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVA announces changes to ensure proper handling of coal ash spill</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/02/06/tva-announces-changes-to-ensure-proper-handling-of-coal-ash-spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/02/06/tva-announces-changes-to-ensure-proper-handling-of-coal-ash-spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Kilgore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the midst of a massive, $1 million-a day-cleanup effort and under the threat of numerous lawsuits, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) today announced organization changes and staff assignments “to ensure the effective, long-term management of the recovery effort at Kingston Fossil Plant,” according to the Chattanoogan. About six weeks ago, a coal ash impoundment [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/02/06/tva-announces-changes-to-ensure-proper-handling-of-coal-ash-spill/">TVA announces changes to ensure proper handling of coal ash spill</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of a massive, $1 million-a day-cleanup effort and under the threat of numerous lawsuits, the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> today announced organization changes and staff assignments “to ensure the effective, long-term management of the recovery effort at <strong>Kingston Fossil Plant</strong>,” according to <a href="http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_144179.asp">the Chattanoogan</a>.<span id="more-254"></span></p>
<p>About six weeks ago, a <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com"><strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> impoundment</strong></a> at the <strong>TVA’s</strong> <strong>Kingston’s</strong> plant failed, pouring 1.1 billion gallons of <strong>toxic mud and slush</strong> over 300 acres of rural east <strong>Tennessee</strong>. The massive outpour destroyed homes and damaged houses in its wake. As a result, the utility said it now must staff an unexpected but essential <strong>recovery effort</strong>.</p>
<p>The changes address three key <strong>TVA</strong> objectives – establishing project management of the recovery effort; consolidating, standardizing and strengthening engineering efforts across the utility; and ensuring leadership for the ongoing operation of <strong>TVA’s</strong> nuclear and fossil plants, according to the report.</p>
<p>Oversight for the overall scope and recovery strategy, agency and public interface and overall progress will be handled by <strong>Anda Ray</strong>. Ray also will oversee all <strong>TVA</strong> environmental activities. Construction and ash and gypsum mediation efforts at all coal plants will be handled by <strong>Bob Deacy</strong>. Both Ray and Deacy will report directly to <strong>TVA CEO Tom Kilgore</strong> to ensure “that <strong>TVA</strong> effectively coordinates all recovery activities” in the Kingston area.</p>
<p><strong>Preston Swafford</strong> was reassigned to be the new executive vice president and chief nuclear officer. <strong>Bill Campbell</strong>, who currently serves as chief nuclear officer, will now serve as senior vice president of all TVA <a href="http://www.fleetattorney.net/" title="" rel="external">Fleet</a> Engineering.</p>
<p>The moves help ensure improved focus and execution of engineering across the <strong>TVA</strong> system, according to a utility spokesman.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/02/06/tva-announces-changes-to-ensure-proper-handling-of-coal-ash-spill/">TVA announces changes to ensure proper handling of coal ash spill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/02/06/tva-announces-changes-to-ensure-proper-handling-of-coal-ash-spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early TVA memo indicates effort to minimize coal ash disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A memo that apparently passed through the hands of several folks at the TVA drafting &#8220;talking points&#8221; about the Kingston Fossil Plant coal ash spill of Dec. 22 appears to attempt to minimize the significance of the disaster, according to a report today from the Associated Press. The memo was apparently sent to the AP [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/">Early TVA memo indicates effort to minimize coal ash disaster</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A memo that apparently passed through the hands of several folks at the <strong>TVA</strong> drafting &#8220;talking points&#8221; about the <strong>Kingston Fossil Plant</strong> <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill of Dec. 22 appears to attempt to minimize the significance of the disaster, according to a report today from the <a href="http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MjUwMTYxNg== ">Associated Press</a>.</p>
<p>The memo was apparently sent to the AP by accident, according to their report. They say the memo shows additions and deletions that change more alarming language to tone down the sense of urgency and threat resulting from the <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a>.</p>
<p>An example cited by the AP story says the word &#8220;catastrophic&#8221; was changed to &#8220;sudden, accidental release&#8221; when describing the spill that flooded more than 300 acres surrounding the energy production plant with toxic coal ash sludge.</p>
<p>While environmentalists are pointing to the memo as evidence that TVA is trying to cover up the seriousness of the situation, TVA representatives say that they were simply trying to present accurate information as they understood it at the beginning of the crisis, the AP reports. As the situation developed, the TVA says it modified its information to upgrade the severity of the situation, the report states.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/">Early TVA memo indicates effort to minimize coal ash disaster</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beasley Allen files coal ash spill class action lawsuit on behalf of residents and property owners affected</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/09/beasley-allen-files-coal-ash-spill-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-residents-and-property-owners-affected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/09/beasley-allen-files-coal-ash-spill-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-residents-and-property-owners-affected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasley Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montgomery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhon Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Montgomery, Ala. &#8211; Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis &#38; Miles, P.C., has filed a class action suit on behalf of property owners damaged by the Dec. 22, 2008 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) spill at the Kingston Fossil Plant. Located 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn., the plant released 1.1 billion gallons of [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/09/beasley-allen-files-coal-ash-spill-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-residents-and-property-owners-affected/">Beasley Allen files coal ash spill class action lawsuit on behalf of residents and property owners affected</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</p>
<p>Montgomery, Ala. &#8211; <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley, Allen</a>, Crow, Methvin, Portis &amp; Miles, P.C., has filed a class action suit on behalf of property owners damaged by the Dec. 22, 2008 <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) spill at the Kingston Fossil Plant. Located 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn., the plant released 1.1 billion gallons of toxin-laden sludge into a rural neighborhood when a waste storage pond retaining wall failed. The suit is filed against the TVA, the nation&#8217;s largest public utility, over potentially the most significant environmental disaster since the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen</a> will be working with attorneys Gary Davis and Mary Parker in Tennessee, both of whom have Environmental experience. Beasley Allen has its own Environmental department to handle cases such as this disaster. The firm has handled previous environmental claims including a $700 million settlement with Monsanto/Solutia in Anniston, Ala., over PCB contamination, the largest environmental settlement in American history. More recently, Beasley Allen obtained a $20.7 million verdict against manufacturers of carbon black for nearby property owners, a verdict that was upheld by the United States Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Coal-fired power plants produce <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> and other toxic waste byproducts. The material is usually stored on site in retention ponds or dams. A failure in the retaining wall, or an overflow, can result in an environmental disaster contaminating surrounding waterways, soil, and wildlife, and endangering human health and life.</p>
<p>There is ongoing debate about how coal ash is stored and regulated. Currently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not regulate these types of retention ponds or the materials contained in them. Surprisingly, the EPA does not consider the coal ash hazardous material. There is a great deal of debate over whether state regulations are sufficient to regulate these retention ponds, as evidenced by this most recent disaster.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is absolutely incredible that there is no real oversight for the storage and safe disposal of this toxic waste,&#8221; said Beasley Allen attorney <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/rhon-jones/" title="Rhon Jones, Environmental Attorney" rel="external">Rhon Jones</a>, who specializes in Environmental issues. &#8220;Most of these retention ponds are not lined or reinforced, and it&#8217;s inevitable that potentially hazardous material will leak out. They just are not a long-term solution. It&#8217;s only a matter of time before the next disaster. These facilities are everywhere &#8211; Alabama, Tennessee. Communities are living under a cloud, uncertain of their safety.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a U.S. Senate hearing set for Jan. 8 to review the Tennessee disaster that will include representatives from the TVA and environmental groups. <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen attorneys</a> have contacted Congressional leaders offering to speak at the hearings, and lawyers from the Beasley Allen team will be present in Washington.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/official-class-action-complaint-tva1.pdf">Beasley Allen Law Firm</a></p>
<p>COMPLAINT:<a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/official-class-action-complaint-tva1.pdf">Official class action complaint filed in TVA case</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/09/beasley-allen-files-coal-ash-spill-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-residents-and-property-owners-affected/">Beasley Allen files coal ash spill class action lawsuit on behalf of residents and property owners affected</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/09/beasley-allen-files-coal-ash-spill-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-residents-and-property-owners-affected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beasley Allen evaluating claims resulting from Tennessee coal-ash spill disaster, eyeing safety of Alabama plants</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/beasley-allen-evaluating-claims-resulting-from-tennessee-coal-ash-spill-disaster-eyeing-safety-of-alabama-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/beasley-allen-evaluating-claims-resulting-from-tennessee-coal-ash-spill-disaster-eyeing-safety-of-alabama-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasley Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montgomery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhon Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MONTGOMERY, ALA. &#8211; Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis &#38; Miles, P.C., is currently evaluating claims on behalf of property owners affected by a devastating coal ash spill in Tennessee. The disaster spilled thousands of pounds of coal ash and toxic waste across more than 300 acres. The event occurred when an earthen [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/beasley-allen-evaluating-claims-resulting-from-tennessee-coal-ash-spill-disaster-eyeing-safety-of-alabama-plants/">Beasley Allen evaluating claims resulting from Tennessee coal-ash spill disaster, eyeing safety of Alabama plants</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</p>
<p>MONTGOMERY, ALA. &#8211; <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley, Allen</a>, Crow, Methvin, Portis &amp; Miles, P.C., is currently evaluating claims on behalf of property owners affected by a devastating <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill</strong> in Tennessee. The disaster spilled thousands of pounds of <strong>coal ash and toxic waste</strong> across more than 300 acres. The event occurred when an earthen retaining wall at the Kingston Fossil Plant failed, creating one of the largest coal fly ash spills in the United States. The plant is located 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tenn.<span id="more-84"></span></p>
<p>Coal-fired power plants produce coal ash and other <strong>toxic waste</strong> byproducts. The waste contains such heavy metals as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese, which have been shown to cause <strong>cancer, liver damage, and neurological complications</strong>. The material is usually stored on site at the energy-production facilities in retention ponds or dams. A failure in the dam&#8217;s retaining wall, or an overflow, can result in an environmental disaster contaminating surrounding waterways, soil, and wildlife, and endangering human health and life.</p>
<p>There are <strong>coal ash</strong> retention ponds at nine locations in Alabama, including six coal-fired steam plants operated by Alabama Power Company. The <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (T.V.A.), which operates the Tennessee plant that failed, also has two coal-fired plants in north Alabama that have ash retention ponds; and PowerSouth Energy Cooperative has a coal ash pond at Lowman Power Plant in southwest Alabama.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given that the Tennessee Valley Authority has similar ponds at its two coal-fired plants in Alabama, we hope that they are making certain that those ponds are sound so that we will not have another <strong>tragedy</strong> like the one at TVA&#8217;s Kingston Steam Plant,&#8221; said <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/rhon-jones/" title="Rhon Jones, Environmental Attorney" rel="external">Rhon Jones</a>, an attorney with <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen</a> who specializes in Environmental law. &#8220;Residents and property owners near all nine <strong>coal ash retention ponds</strong> in Alabama are counting on these ponds to be safe and secure. No property owner should have to go through the disaster facing those persons in Tennessee near the Kingston Steam Plant.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to Alabama&#8217;s Department of Environmental Management, all nine coal-fired power plants in Alabama were inspected following the Tennessee disaster, and all passed inspection with no problems. However, there is some debate about how coal ash is stored and regulated. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not regulate these types of retention ponds or the materials contained in them. Surprisingly, the EPA does not consider the coal ash <strong>hazardous material</strong>. There is a great deal of debate over whether state regulations are sufficient to regulate these retention ponds, as evidenced by this most recent disaster. For the greatest protection to the public, we recommend coal ash should be buried in lined landfills rather than retention ponds or dams, to prevent it from leaking out and contaminating waterways, groundwater and soil.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/news/Beasley-Allen-evaluating-claims-resulting-from-Tennessee-coal-ash-spill-disaster,-eyeing-safety-of-Alabama-plants/">Beasley Allen Press Release</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/beasley-allen-evaluating-claims-resulting-from-tennessee-coal-ash-spill-disaster-eyeing-safety-of-alabama-plants/">Beasley Allen evaluating claims resulting from Tennessee coal-ash spill disaster, eyeing safety of Alabama plants</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/beasley-allen-evaluating-claims-resulting-from-tennessee-coal-ash-spill-disaster-eyeing-safety-of-alabama-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Ash Flood Larger Than Initial Estimate</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/07/tennessee-ash-flood-larger-than-initial-estimate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/07/tennessee-ash-flood-larger-than-initial-estimate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Helen Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Environment and Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Shaila Dewan, New York Times A coal ash spill in eastern Tennessee that experts were already calling the largest environmental disaster of its kind in the United States is more than three times as large as initially estimated, according to an updated survey by the Tennessee Valley Authority. Officials at the authority initially said [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/07/tennessee-ash-flood-larger-than-initial-estimate/">Tennessee Ash Flood Larger Than Initial Estimate</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-update-11.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-80" title="Aerial photograph of the area affected by the coal ash spill." src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-update-1-300x200.jpg" alt="coal ash spill update 1 300x200 Tennessee Ash Flood Larger Than Initial Estimate" width="300" height="200" /></a>By Shaila Dewan, New York Times</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill in eastern Tennessee that experts were already calling the largest environmental disaster of its kind in the United States is more than three times as large as initially estimated, according to an updated survey by the <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a>.<span id="more-75"></span></p>
<p>Officials at the authority initially said that about 1.7 million cubic yards of wet coal ash had spilled when the earthen retaining wall of an ash pond at the Kingston Fossil Plant, about 40 miles west of Knoxville, gave way on Monday. But on Thursday they released the results of an aerial survey that showed the actual amount was 5.4 million cubic yards, or enough to flood more than 3,000 acres one foot deep.</p>
<p>The amount now said to have been spilled is larger than the amount the authority initially said was in the pond, 2.6 million cubic yards.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-site1.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-76" title="Coal ash spill site and how fly ash is produced" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-site-299x182.gif" alt="coal ash spill site 299x182 Tennessee Ash Flood Larger Than Initial Estimate" width="299" height="182" /></a></p>
<p>A test of river water near the spill showed elevated levels of lead and thallium, which can cause <a href="http://www.paxilandpregnancy.com/paxil-birth-defects/birth-defects/" title="" rel="external">birth defects</a> and nervous and reproductive system disorders, said John Moulton, a spokesman for the T.V.A., which owns the electrical generating plant, one of the authority’s largest.</p>
<p>Mr. Moulton said Friday that the levels exceeded safety limits for drinking water, but that both metals were filtered out by water treatment processes.</p>
<p>Mercury and arsenic, he said, were “barely detectable” in the samples.</p>
<p>The ash pond was adjacent to the Emory River and near a residential area, where three houses were destroyed by the tide of muddy ash. Water sampled several miles downstream from the spill was safe to drink, but its iron and manganese content exceeded the secondary drinking water standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency, which govern taste and odor but not potential health effects, Mr. Moulton said.</p>
<p>Neither the authority nor the E.P.A. has released the results of tests of soil or the ash itself. Authority officials have said that the ash is not harmful, and the authority has not warned residents of potential dangers, though federal studies show that coal ash can contain dangerous levels of heavy metals and carcinogens.</p>
<p>“You’re not going to be endangered by touching the ash material,” said Barbara Martocci, a spokeswoman for the T.V.A. “You’d have to eat it. You have to get it in your body.”</p>
<p>The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation also released a statement saying there was no indication of risk unless the ash was ingested.</p>
<p>But residents like Deanna Copeland were thinking further into the future.</p>
<p>“Our concern is, what happens if this liquid dries out?” Ms. Copeland said. “There are huge health concerns. It’s going to get in our house. We’re going to breathe it in. It would be like walking through a dust bowl, and we don’t know what’s in the dust.”</p>
<p>A round-the-clock cleanup effort continued on Friday, much of it clearing roads and railway tracks that were blocked by the sludge. Several booms, or skimmers, were installed on nearby rivers to catch floating cenospheres, a valuable component of the ash used to make bowling balls and other manufactured goods. A weir, or underwater dam, that would keep settled ash from moving downstream was about one-fifth completed, T.V.A. officials said.</p>
<p>Some nearby residents said that the authority had done little to address their concerns.</p>
<p>“We’re terribly frustrated,” said Donald Smith, 58, a laboratory facilities manager who lives in the affected area. “It seems like T.V.A. is just throwing darts at the problem, and they don’t have a clue how to really fix it.</p>
<p>“It was nice that they came by to talk to us. They’re making an effort. But what upsets me is they didn’t have a plan in place. Why hadn’t anybody thought, ‘What happens if this thing bursts?’ ”</p>
<p>Residents said they were stunned by the new figure for the size of the spill.</p>
<p>“That’s scary to know that they can be off by that much,” said Angela Spurgeon, whose dock and yard are swamped with ash. “I don’t think it was intentional, but it upsets me to know that a number was given of what the pond could hold, and the number now is more than double.”</p>
<p>Authority officials offered little explanation for the discrepancy, saying the initial number was an estimate based on their information at the time.</p>
<p>Ms. Spurgeon said the scope of the disaster was difficult to fathom, even from photos.</p>
<p>“This is not a thin coating of ash,” she said. “These are boulders. There’s one in our cove that’s probably the size of our home.”</p>
<p>The spill has reignited a debate over whether coal ash should be federally regulated as a hazardous material.</p>
<p>Environmentalists have long argued that coal ash, which can contaminate groundwater and poison aquatic environments, should be stored in lined landfills. The ash ponds at Kingston were separated from the river only by earthen dikes. Coal plants around the country, most near rivers that supply the water they need to operate, store coal ash in unlined embankments and ponds, and in some areas coal ash is recycled as fill material.</p>
<p>The T.V.A. is still investigating the cause of the breach, but officials have suggested that unusually heavy rain and freezing temperatures may have been factors.</p>
<p>SOURCE: THE NEW YORK TIMES</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/07/tennessee-ash-flood-larger-than-initial-estimate/">Tennessee Ash Flood Larger Than Initial Estimate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/07/tennessee-ash-flood-larger-than-initial-estimate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-update-11-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-update-11.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Aerial photograph of the area affected by the coal ash spill.</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-update-11-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-site1.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Coal ash spill site and how fly ash is produced</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/coal-ash-spill-site1-150x150.gif" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Coal Ash Spill Before And After &#8212; And What&#8217;s Next</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2008/12/31/tennessee-coal-ash-spill-before-and-after-and-whats-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2008/12/31/tennessee-coal-ash-spill-before-and-after-and-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Helen Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Dave Burdick December 30, 2008 The online environmental community is abuzz with reports of all kinds about the coal ash sludge spill in Tennessee, ranging from first-hand accounts to health concerns to worries about coal in general. Twitter in particular has been a place where people have been posting news stories and concerns. A [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2008/12/31/tennessee-coal-ash-spill-before-and-after-and-whats-next/">Tennessee Coal Ash Spill Before And After &#8212; And What&#8217;s Next</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Dave Burdick</p>
<p>December 30, 2008</p>
<p>The online environmental community is abuzz with reports of all kinds about the <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> sludge spill in Tennessee, ranging from first-hand accounts to health concerns to worries about coal in general. Twitter in particular has been a place where people have been posting news stories and concerns.</p>
<p>A local blog also posted before and after photos of the affected area.</p>
<p>Joe Romm blogs at ClimateProgress that the muck has a lot of people worried about how easy it would be for another such spill to happen:</p>
<p>Coal ash deposits in the USA are now under renewed scrutiny after a giant spill just before Christmas released 5.4 million cubic yards of toxic sludge into Tennessee waterways. Water tests near the spill from the Kingston Fossil Plant showed elevated levels of lead and thallium, which can cause <a href="http://www.paxilandpregnancy.com/paxil-birth-defects/birth-defects/" title="" rel="external">birth defects</a> and nervous and reproductive system disorders. The spill muddied the waters in the Emory river and is flowing into tributaries of the Tennessee River &#8211; the water supply for Chattanooga and millions of people living downstream in Alabama, Tennessee and Kentucky.</p>
<p>So now a big question mark hangs over the hundreds of coal plants all across the country which store their fly ash in unlined embankments and ponds &#8212; like the one that failed last week. Most are situated near rivers that supply water needed by the coal plants to operate.</p>
<p>The NY Times reported that in the US, coal plants produce 129 million tons of postcombustion byproducts a year. It&#8217;s the second-largest waste stream in the country, after municipal solid waste, and it&#8217;s storage and handling is unregulated. Who knew?</p>
<p>Source: <em>Huffington Post</em></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2008/12/31/tennessee-coal-ash-spill-before-and-after-and-whats-next/">Tennessee Coal Ash Spill Before And After &#8212; And What&#8217;s Next</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2008/12/31/tennessee-coal-ash-spill-before-and-after-and-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

