<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Coal Ash Spill &#187; toxic coal ash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/toxic-coal-ash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trial underway to determine liability in TVA coal ash spill litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2011/09/16/trial-underway-to-determine-liability-in-tva-coal-ash-spill-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2011/09/16/trial-underway-to-determine-liability-in-tva-coal-ash-spill-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasley Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=1456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan began preliminary matters Thursday in Knoxville, Tenn., regarding the massive coal ash spill that dumped 5.4 million cubic yards of sludge from a TVA storage pond into the Emory River and surrounding community on Dec. 22, 2008. The toxic tidal wave poured from a breached containment pond at the Kingston [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2011/09/16/trial-underway-to-determine-liability-in-tva-coal-ash-spill-litigation/">Trial underway to determine liability in TVA coal ash spill litigation</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan began preliminary matters Thursday in Knoxville, Tenn., regarding the massive <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill</strong> that dumped 5.4 million cubic yards of sludge from a <strong>TVA storage pond</strong> into the Emory River and surrounding community on Dec. 22, 2008. The toxic tidal wave poured from a breached containment pond at the <strong>Kingston Plant</strong> and affected hundreds of people who made their home in nearby Roane County, Tenn. This trial will determine liability in the case, but will not address damages at this time.<span id="more-1456"></span></p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TVA_COAL_ASH?SITE=DCTMS&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">news report by the Associated Press</a>, &#8220;The Environmental Protection Agency has described the spill as&#8217; &#8216;one of the worst <strong>environmental disasters</strong> of its kind.&#8217;&#8221; To put things in perspective with another recent environmental catastrophe, the <strong>BP oil spill</strong> released about 206 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico over the course of nearly five months. The TVA <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a> released more than a billion gallons of toxic sludge over 300 acres in East Tennessee within the course of minutes.</p>
<p>The cleanup efforts, which have been ongoing since the spill and are expected to cost around $1.2 billion, include the removal of more than 3.5 million cubic yards of ash and sediment from the Emory River, providing funding for a community betterment foundation for Roane County, and providing health screenings to affected residents. Coal ash contains such toxins as arsenic, lead, mercury and other heavy metals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen attorneys</a> are working with counsel for Plaintiffs in the other four lawsuits that have been consolidated for this bench trial. The litigation involves more than 230 Plaintiffs.</p>
<p>&#8220;After nearly three years, the residents and property owners affected by the coal ash spill are now getting their chance to hold TVA accountable for the destruction of their very way of life,&#8221; <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/" title="" rel="external">Beasley Allen</a> lawyer <a href="http://www.beasleyallen.com/attorney/david-byrne/" title="David Byrne, Environmental Attorney" rel="external">David Byrne</a> says.</p>
<p>TVA continues to argue that it is not liable for the spill, and according to the AP report says that &#8220;under Tennessee law it has no legal duty to keep its reservoirs and shorelines safe for the plaintiffs&#8217; recreational use and enjoyment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Parties will make opening arguments and testimony will begin on Monday.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2011/09/16/trial-underway-to-determine-liability-in-tva-coal-ash-spill-litigation/">Trial underway to determine liability in TVA coal ash spill litigation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2011/09/16/trial-underway-to-determine-liability-in-tva-coal-ash-spill-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA guidelines may require coal-firing plants to plan for disasters</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/11/epa-guidelines-may-require-coal-firing-plants-to-plan-for-disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/11/epa-guidelines-may-require-coal-firing-plants-to-plan-for-disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-firing plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=1244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may be delayed in proposing new regulations for storage of toxic coal ash, but one item expected to be on the agency’s proposal is gaining applause from conservation groups. The EPA says its plan includes a requirement for coal-firing plants to set aside money that would be used in the [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/11/epa-guidelines-may-require-coal-firing-plants-to-plan-for-disasters/">EPA guidelines may require coal-firing plants to plan for disasters</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-376" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" alt="epa 150x150 EPA guidelines may require coal firing plants to plan for disasters" width="100" height="100" title="EPA guidelines may require coal firing plants to plan for disasters" /></a>The <strong>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)</strong> may be delayed in proposing new regulations for storage of <strong>toxic <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong>, but one item expected to be on the agency’s proposal is gaining applause from conservation groups. The EPA says its plan includes a requirement for <strong>coal-firing plants</strong> to set aside money that would be used in the event of future toxic waste problems, such as spills or leaks like the one from the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> plant in December 2008 that devastated a neighboring east Tennessee community.<span id="more-1244"></span></p>
<p>Coal ash is not classified as a hazardous material and thus did not fall under federal regulations, but that changed in December 2008 when an impoundment pond at the east Tennessee TVA plant breached. The EPA has spent the past year inspecting coal ash storage facilities and utilities throughout the country and developing guidelines for safe storage. Those guidelines were expected to be announced by the end of 2009, but the EPA said it needed more time. That extra time may help the EPA identify and close loopholes that would otherwise leave customers of those plants footing the bill for any problems that arise.</p>
<p>The east Tennessee <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a> is a prime example. That disaster sent more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring community. The TVA is expected to spend more than a billion dollars over three years cleaning up that mess. Who is footing the cost of that cleanup? Millions of TVA customers every month in their utility bills.</p>
<p>TVA will soon begin negotiating with insurance companies, hoping to offset the cost of the spill for its customers. According to the South Carolina <a href="http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/jan/11/epa-concerned-about-coal-ash-cleanup-costs/">Post and Courier</a>, many industries that handle <strong>hazardous materials</strong> must obtain bonds and other forms of insurance to cover potential <strong>toxic waste cleanups</strong>; however, power plants, chemical manufacturers and oil refineries in many cases were excluded from these requirements.</p>
<p>With any luck, when the EPA unveils its proposed guidelines, plants that store toxic materials will be required to hold money aside for such disasters so that their customers don’t have to pay for their problems.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/11/epa-guidelines-may-require-coal-firing-plants-to-plan-for-disasters/">EPA guidelines may require coal-firing plants to plan for disasters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2010/01/11/epa-guidelines-may-require-coal-firing-plants-to-plan-for-disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">epa</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Davis fights for people of Perry County in coal ash debate</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/15/rep-davis-fights-for-people-of-perry-county/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/15/rep-davis-fights-for-people-of-perry-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artur Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal safety standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toxic coal ash recovered from a massive spill site in east Tennessee was deemed too dangerous by the state of Pennsylvania to be stored there, but some Alabama officials welcomed that coal ash with open arms. One U.S. Representative from Alabama is standing up for the people, urging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/15/rep-davis-fights-for-people-of-perry-county/">Rep. Davis fights for people of Perry County in coal ash debate</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/10/Artur-Davis.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-993" title="Artur Davis" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/10/Artur-Davis-100x100.jpg" alt="Artur Davis 100x100 Rep. Davis fights for people of Perry County in coal ash debate" width="100" height="100" /></a>Toxic <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> recovered from a massive spill site in <strong>east Tennessee</strong> was deemed <strong>too dangerous</strong> by the state of Pennsylvania to be stored there, but some Alabama officials welcomed that coal ash with open arms. One U.S. Representative from <strong>Alabama</strong> is standing up for the people, urging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish consistent standards at the federal level that would fully address legitimate concerns about the content of <strong>coal ash waste</strong>.<span id="more-989"></span></p>
<p>“If coal ash poses an unacceptable level of risk, inconsistent state standards should be immediately replaced with national guidelines that would put the safety of the people in one community on the same level as families living in another,” said <strong>Rep. Artur Davis</strong>, D-Birmingham, in a letter to EPA Administrator <strong>Lisa Jackson</strong> and circulated around the House of Representatives.</p>
<p><strong>Coal ash</strong> is not considered a hazardous material, and thus does not fall under federal regulation. However, improvements in coal ash burning facilities over the decades have made the smoke released into the air much cleaner. Those toxins instead settle in the coal ash left behind. Tests show that coal ash can contain dangerous levels of arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium – toxins that have linked to serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. That toxic ash is stored in dry or wet landfills throughout the country.</p>
<p>A December 2008 coal ash impoundment breach at a <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong>plant brought the question of the safety of coal ash into the spotlight. Last year’s <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a> dumped more than a billion gallons of coal ash on to a neighboring community, knocking houses off their foundations, destroying property, and contaminating nearby waterways. Environmentalists called it the <strong>largest environmental disaster</strong> of its kind in U.S. history. The TVA began an estimated three-year, $1 billion cleanup of the area, which includes relocating the recovered coal ash to landfills in other counties and states. The first shipments of recovered coal ash have already been shipped by railcar to a landfill in <strong>Perry County, Alabama</strong>.</p>
<p>Storing the recovered coal ash in Perry County will generate about $3 million in storage fees and bring in about 30 jobs to the poverty-stricken, predominantly black county, which some local officials consider a boon. But people who live and work there say they fear they are sitting on a time bomb that could one day destroy their property and livelihoods.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, Davis met with residents of Perry County who voiced their concerns, asking if there are any guarantees that the dangerous toxins will leach into drinking water or create any health problems now or in the future. Davis’ letter to the EPA aims to address those concerns and move forward EPA efforts to establish <strong>federal safety standards</strong> that are balanced among all states.</p>
<p><em>Source: </em><a href="http://www.selmatimesjournal.com/news/2009/oct/15/davis-letter-raises-questions-about-coal-ash/"><em>Selma Times Journal</em></a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/15/rep-davis-fights-for-people-of-perry-county/">Rep. Davis fights for people of Perry County in coal ash debate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/15/rep-davis-fights-for-people-of-perry-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/10/Artur-Davis-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/10/Artur-Davis.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Artur Davis</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/10/Artur-Davis-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cumberland residents say &#8216;no;&#8217; officials say &#8216;yes&#8217; to coal ash</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/14/cumberland-residents-say-no-officials-say-yes-to-coal-ash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/14/cumberland-residents-say-no-officials-say-yes-to-coal-ash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumberland county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perry County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smith Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cumberland County, Tennessee, officials saw dollar signs and improved highways when they approved the relocation of coal ash recovered from a neighboring spill site to a landfill atop Smith Mountain. “I call it the Good Neighbor Plan,” says Commissioner Lynn Tollett. “We’ve got a place to put (the recovered coal ash). We can help out [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/14/cumberland-residents-say-no-officials-say-yes-to-coal-ash/">Cumberland residents say &#8216;no;&#8217; officials say &#8216;yes&#8217; to coal ash</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cumberland County, Tennessee,</strong> officials saw dollar signs and improved highways when they approved the relocation of <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> recovered from a neighboring spill site to a landfill atop <strong>Smith Mountain</strong>. “I call it the Good Neighbor Plan,” says Commissioner Lynn Tollett. “We’ve got a place to put (the recovered coal ash). We can help out and we’re going to gain some income at a time when the economy is not what it ought to be.”</p>
<p><span id="more-972"></span></p>
<p>The county will reap about $8 million over three years from fees. The project will also help improve the mine where the coal ash will be stored and bring road improvements so that covered trucks can haul the coal ash up the mountain to the landfill. What could be wrong with such a plan?</p>
<p>Plenty, say residents who live near the landfill. “I’ve been here for about three years. It’s just a beautiful place. It’s waterfalls, ponds, nature,” says David Brundage, owner of Black Cat Lodge, a rehabilitation escape for people recovering from drug and alcohol addictions. “My concern is everything I’ve built, everything I have here is going to be gone.”</p>
<p>It’s a valid concern. People who lived in the east <strong>Tennessee</strong> community of <strong>Kingston</strong> know far too well what can happen in a worse-case scenario. Residents there lost homes and property when 1.1 billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> tumbled from an impoundment pond from the nearby <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong>coal-burning site. The December 2008 tragedy is listed as the largest <strong>environmental disaster</strong> of its kind in U.S. history. In an effort to restore the land, TVA is undergoing a three-year, $1 billion cleanup of the land. As part of the cleanup, gallons of <strong>recovered coal ash</strong> are being shipped via train car to a landfill in <strong>Perry County</strong>, <strong>Alabama,</strong> for storage, a move that is winning more support from Perry County officials than from the residents who live there.</p>
<p>Once the Alabama landfill is filled to its brim, TVA officials plan to load up covered trucks and move the <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> to neighboring Cumberland County, atop Smith Mountain. Which begs the question: <em>how do you define a good neighbor?</em></p>
<p><em>Source: </em><a href="http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?S=11296105"><em>News Channel 5 </em></a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/14/cumberland-residents-say-no-officials-say-yes-to-coal-ash/">Cumberland residents say &#8216;no;&#8217; officials say &#8216;yes&#8217; to coal ash</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/14/cumberland-residents-say-no-officials-say-yes-to-coal-ash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory River to remain closed until February as cleanup continues</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/13/emory-river-to-remain-closed-until-february-as-cleanup-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/13/emory-river-to-remain-closed-until-february-as-cleanup-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 1 ½-mile stretch of the Emory River in east Tennessee will remain closed to boat traffic through mid-February – several months longer than expected – while the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) continues to dredge the river to remove toxic coal ash that spilled there following a coal ash impoundment pond breach last December. The [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/13/emory-river-to-remain-closed-until-february-as-cleanup-continues/">Emory River to remain closed until February as cleanup continues</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 1 ½-mile stretch of the <strong>Emory River</strong> in east Tennessee will remain closed to boat traffic through mid-February – several months longer than expected – while the <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) continues to dredge the river to remove <strong>toxic <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> that spilled there following a <strong>coal ash impoundment pond breach</strong> last December. The dredging is part of a three-year, $1 billion cleanup of the area with hopes to restore the land and waterways that were badly damaged and contaminated following the massive spill.<span id="more-963"></span></p>
<p>The river was originally closed for 30 days in early August, followed by another 30-day extension. Now the TVA says it needs more time to remove the coal ash that spilled into the Emory River. TVA officials and the Environmental Protection Agency will review the situation in early February and decide when the river can be reopened at that time.</p>
<p>Six days a week, as many as 110 railcars filled with coal ash recovered from the river are being transported to a landfill in <strong>Alabama</strong> for storage. Despite the constant effort, only about one-third of the coal ash has been removed from the Emory. Once the river has been cleared, crews will turn their focus to the coal ash piled on the land.</p>
<p>During the closure, no river traffic will be allowed in order to make room for huge hydraulic dredging equipment. Those who have a significant need for transportation around the closed portion of the Emory River may request access by contacting the TVA by phone at least five days in advance.</p>
<p><em>Sources:<br />
</em> <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/oct/09/tva-extends-emory-river-closure/"><em>Knox News</em></a><em><br />
</em> <a href="http://www.oakridger.com/news/x576545830/TVA-cleanup-of-river-about-one-third-complete"><em>OakRidger.com</em></a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/13/emory-river-to-remain-closed-until-february-as-cleanup-continues/">Emory River to remain closed until February as cleanup continues</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/10/13/emory-river-to-remain-closed-until-february-as-cleanup-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVA to raise rates, borrow money, cut spending</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/03/tva-to-raise-rates-borrow-money-cut-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/03/tva-to-raise-rates-borrow-money-cut-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), facing a near-$1 billion bill for the cleanup of a massive coal ash spill at its Kingston, Tenn., coal-firing plant, a pension shortfall, waning power sales, and court-ordered environmental upgrades, says it will increase electric rates, borrow up to $3 billion over three years, and cut spending in order to [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/03/tva-to-raise-rates-borrow-money-cut-spending/">TVA to raise rates, borrow money, cut spending</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong>, facing a near-$1 billion bill for the cleanup of a <strong>massive <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill</strong> at its Kingston, Tenn., coal-firing plant, a pension shortfall, waning power sales, and court-ordered environmental upgrades, says it will increase electric rates, borrow up to $3 billion over three years, and cut spending in order to pay its due.<span id="more-826"></span></p>
<p>The nation’s largest utility has been caught in a swarm of  bad luck, beginning with the largest drop in sales it had ever seen in its 76-year history, thanks to a struggling national economy. That was compounded by court-ordered clean-air improvements to its plants, which will cost the TVA millions over the next several years. But the biggest slam to the agency is last December’s <strong>impoundment pond breach</strong> that sent more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> tumbling down on to a neighboring community. The wave of sludge toppled houses, damaged property, and contaminated neighboring waterways.</p>
<p>A months-long cleanup is underway and expected to ring in at nearly $1 billion before it is complete. That cost doesn’t include money the agency is paying out to buy damaged property and pay off suffering residents. The TVA is also facing a <strong>mountain of lawsuits</strong> from residents and at least one business owner who suffered because of the spill.</p>
<p>TVA is also spending a pretty penny to salvage its tainted public image. Raising customers’ rates won’t help, but because fuel costs continue to drop, the TVA says most customers will actually see a reduction in their monthly power bills despite the rate change.</p>
<p>Aside from cutting or freezing cost-of-living pension increases and increasing rates, TVA will also defer capital projects in hopes of saving nearly $2 billion over the next three years.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j5zJUw7ec5N1FmY-NyTtNW-DmgqAD9A6SDJO0">Associated Press</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/03/tva-to-raise-rates-borrow-money-cut-spending/">TVA to raise rates, borrow money, cut spending</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/09/03/tva-to-raise-rates-borrow-money-cut-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Residents near coal ash spill sign up for free medical screenings</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/27/residents-near-coal-ash-spill-sign-up-for-free-medical-screenings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/27/residents-near-coal-ash-spill-sign-up-for-free-medical-screenings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Ridge Associated Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Poison Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt University Medical Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 100 people in Tennessee are concerned enough about their health following a massive coal ash spill in their community that they have signed up for free medical screenings. These are people who lived in or around Kingston, Tennessee last December when a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) coal ash impoundment pond burst, sending 1.1 [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/27/residents-near-coal-ash-spill-sign-up-for-free-medical-screenings/">Residents near coal ash spill sign up for free medical screenings</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 100 people in <strong>Tennessee</strong> are concerned enough about their health following a massive <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill</strong> in their community that they have signed up for free medical screenings. These are people who lived in or around Kingston, Tennessee last December when a <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> coal ash impoundment pond burst, sending 1.1 billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> on to 300 acres of neighboring property and into the Emory River.</p>
<p>That spill destroyed homes and damaged property and forced officials to hang signs warning people against swimming in nearby waters or eating fish caught in them. The threat of the coal ash drying and flying into the air caused more concern from residents who worried breathing traces of <strong>fly ash</strong> might harm them.<span id="more-805"></span></p>
<p>Coal ash contains dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, barium, chromium and manganese which may lead to health problems such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Currently, the TVA is involved in a massive cleanup that is expected to cost the nation’s largest utility nearly $1 billion. The TVA estimates that the cleanup effort will be completed by spring 2010.</p>
<p>The TVA is also paying for the medical exams for the residents who choose to have them. The tests will be performed at local medical clinics and physicians and the results will remain confidential. <strong>Oak Ridge Associated Universities</strong> and the <strong>Tennessee Poison Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center</strong> are providing evaluations for anyone who believes they have been affected.</p>
<p><em>Sources:<br />
</em> <a href="http://www.reflector.com/news/state/more-than-100-in-tennessee-seek-coal-ash-testing-793896.html"><em>The Daily Reflector</em></a><em><br />
</em> <a href="http://www.waaytv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10983652"><em>WAAY-TV</em></a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/27/residents-near-coal-ash-spill-sign-up-for-free-medical-screenings/">Residents near coal ash spill sign up for free medical screenings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/27/residents-near-coal-ash-spill-sign-up-for-free-medical-screenings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will TVA consumers&#8217; voices fall on deaf ears?</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/20/will-tva-consumers-voices-fall-on-deaf-ears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/20/will-tva-consumers-voices-fall-on-deaf-ears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Valley Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a public meeting this week, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) consumers voiced concerns about the safety of moving toxic coal ash from the Kingston, Tenn., plant and whether the nation’s largest utility has considered natural gas for electricity production over coal and nuclear power. But those concerns may likely have fallen on deaf ears. The [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/20/will-tva-consumers-voices-fall-on-deaf-ears/">Will TVA consumers&#8217; voices fall on deaf ears?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a public meeting this week, <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> consumers voiced concerns about the safety of moving <strong>toxic <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> from the Kingston, Tenn., plant and whether the nation’s largest utility has considered natural gas for electricity production over coal and nuclear power. But those concerns may likely have fallen on deaf ears.<span id="more-795"></span></p>
<p>The TVA has pulled together an advisory panel to put together an <strong>Integrated Resource Plan</strong> that will set the course for the utility for the next several years. But some are skeptical that consumers’ interests will be considered, arguing that the advisory panel is stacked with industry and large electricity users and advocates of nuclear power. Few consumers and conservation-minded individuals have a voice in the group.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the panel does not plan to allow the public to listen to the meetings, nor will it provide notes of the meetings. “At the end of the day, we know our interest will not have a fair hearing,” says Louise Gorenflo with the Solar Valley Coalition. The <strong>Solar Valley Coalition</strong> is a network of sustainable energy advocates across Tennessee, originally founded in January 2007 to respond to the TVA’s Draft Strategic Plan, which had omitted the words “energy efficiency,” “energy conservation,” and “renewable energy.”</p>
<p>Last December, more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> broke free from an impoundment pond at the TVA’s Kingston plant and poured onto a neighboring community. The sludge knocked houses off their foundations, flooded property and oozed into the nearby <strong>Emory River</strong>. Called one of the largest <strong>environmental disasters</strong> in the country, the massive <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a> will likely cost the TVA more than a $1 billion in clean up efforts and payments to those who suffered property loss or are suffering from health concerns from inhalation of fly ash.</p>
<p>This week’s TVA board agenda includes a possible rate change to help offset the utility’s costs.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.tennessean.com/article/20090820/NEWS01/90820013/Public+urges+TVA+board+toward+conservation++keeping+coal+ash">Tennessean</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/20/will-tva-consumers-voices-fall-on-deaf-ears/">Will TVA consumers&#8217; voices fall on deaf ears?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/08/20/will-tva-consumers-voices-fall-on-deaf-ears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposal to store coal ash could bring jobs to Cumberland County</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/06/04/proposal-to-store-coal-ash-could-bring-jobs-to-cumberland-county/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/06/04/proposal-to-store-coal-ash-could-bring-jobs-to-cumberland-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossville coal inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumberland county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morgan county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smith Mountain Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not everyone is trying to keep the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) from dumping coal ash on its property. One company wants the TVA to pay them to haul and hold coal ash in its Cumberland County strip mine. TVA has been involved in a massive cleanup effort ever since its Kingston, Tennessee coal ash impoundment [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/06/04/proposal-to-store-coal-ash-could-bring-jobs-to-cumberland-county/">Proposal to store coal ash could bring jobs to Cumberland County</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone is trying to keep the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong>from dumping <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> on its property. One company wants the TVA to pay them to haul and hold coal ash in its <strong>Cumberland County strip mine</strong>.<span id="more-639"></span></p>
<p>TVA has been involved in a massive cleanup effort ever since its <strong>Kingston, Tennessee coal ash impoundment pond</strong> burst last December and dumped more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash </strong>on to 300 acres of a neighboring community and into the <strong>Emory River</strong>. No end seems to be in the near future for the country’s largest public utility, which says it expects to pay upwards of $975 million restoring the property.</p>
<p>That cleanup process has involved locating landfills and storage sites in neighboring states to store the coal ash removed from the spill site. However, residents of those sites have expressed concerns over having <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> in their backyards. Coal ash has been found to contain dangerous material such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium, which have been associated with serious health concerns such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.</p>
<p><strong>Smith Mountain Solutions, LLC</strong>, says it has an option on a 300-acre site owned by <strong>Crossville Coal Inc.</strong>, located in a remote corner of <strong>Cumberland County</strong> near the <strong>Morgan County</strong> line that would accommodate the recovered coal ash. According to the proposal, TVA would pay Cumberland County between $7.5 million and $8.5 million over three years to hold the coal ash. Part of that cost would cover improvements to Smith Mountain Road. The project would also create about 100 jobs for local residents.</p>
<p>Members of Smith Mountain met with residents earlier this week to discuss the proposal, which was met with both support and objections.</p>
<p>While TVA has been told about the proposal, no agreement ha been signed. The plan also would have to be approved by the <strong>Cumberland County Commission</strong>, and <strong>Smith Mountain</strong> would have to obtain a state permit.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/jun/03/company-proposes-tva-coal-ash-be-hauled-strip-mine/&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;">Knoxville.biz</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/06/04/proposal-to-store-coal-ash-could-bring-jobs-to-cumberland-county/">Proposal to store coal ash could bring jobs to Cumberland County</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/06/04/proposal-to-store-coal-ash-could-bring-jobs-to-cumberland-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA to oversee TVA&#8217;s coal ash cleanup efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/18/epa-to-oversee-tvas-coal-ash-cleanup-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/18/epa-to-oversee-tvas-coal-ash-cleanup-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Environment and Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazardous waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superfund law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed an enforceable agreement with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to oversee the removal of coal ash from its east Tennessee fossil fuel plant where a coal ash impoundment breached and dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring community and into the [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/18/epa-to-oversee-tvas-coal-ash-cleanup-efforts/">EPA to oversee TVA&#8217;s coal ash cleanup efforts</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-366" title="tva-logo" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/tva-logo-150x150.png" alt="tva logo 150x150 EPA to oversee TVAs coal ash cleanup efforts" width="100" height="100" />The <strong>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)</strong> signed an enforceable agreement with the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong>to oversee the removal of <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> from its east Tennessee fossil fuel plant where a coal ash impoundment breached and dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to a neighboring community and into the Emory River. The TVA was also ordered to reimburse the EPA for any costs associated with its oversight of the cleanup.<span id="more-574"></span></p>
<p>As part of the oversight, TVA is required to perform a comprehensive cleanup from the <strong>Emory River</strong> and surrounding areas. The utility’s work will be subject to review and approval by the EPA, which will consult with the <strong>Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC)</strong>. Any remaining contamination will be assessed and determination will be made whether additional actions are needed.</p>
<p>The agreement was reached under the <strong>Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980</strong>, or <strong>Superfund law</strong>, which gives the EPA the authority to step in and force responsible parties to take action at hazardous waste sites and ensure community involvement.</p>
<p>Residents near the damaged spill site say they see the move as positive. “I just don’t think the TVA has the know-how to do this work,” one resident said to <a href="http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=87367&amp;catid=2">WBIR-TV</a>. “It’ll be better with the EPA taking over. I think they’ll do the right thing.”</p>
<p>&#8220;TDEC welcomes EPA&#8217;s action and the continued collaborative partnership between our agencies,&#8221; said TDEC Deputy Commissioner Paul Sloan. &#8220;This successful partnership is vital to the cleanup of the TVA ash spill and we will continue to work with EPA to ensure the cleanup in Roane County is thorough and protective of both public health and the environment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/7e39c49bea407817852575b30064e666?OpenDocument">EPA</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/18/epa-to-oversee-tvas-coal-ash-cleanup-efforts/">EPA to oversee TVA&#8217;s coal ash cleanup efforts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/05/18/epa-to-oversee-tvas-coal-ash-cleanup-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/tva-logo-150x150.png" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/tva-logo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tva-logo</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/tva-logo-150x150.png" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engineers raised questions about coal ash pond walls decades ago</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/08/engineers-raised-questions-about-coal-ash-pond-walls-decades-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/08/engineers-raised-questions-about-coal-ash-pond-walls-decades-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal-burning plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Environment and Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For decades, engineers raised questions about the walls of an impoundment pond containing toxic coal ash at the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston, Tennessee coal-burning plant, according to the KnoxvilleBiz.com. They questioned the way the walls were built and argued that they were not initially designed to stand as tall as they did. Those concerns [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/08/engineers-raised-questions-about-coal-ash-pond-walls-decades-ago/">Engineers raised questions about coal ash pond walls decades ago</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, engineers raised questions about the walls of an <strong>impoundment pond</strong> containing <strong>toxic <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong> at the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> Kingston, Tennessee <strong>coal-burning plant</strong>, according to the <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/apr/05/tva-spill-insights-documents-show-previous-questio/">KnoxvilleBiz.com</a>. They questioned the way the walls were built and argued that they were not initially designed to stand as tall as they did. Those concerns fell on deaf ears then, but now have a voice after the walls of the pond broke loose last December and dumped 1.1 billion gallons of toxic material on to 300 acres of an east Tennessee community and into the waters of the Emory River.<span id="more-490"></span></p>
<p>The engineers concerns about the stability of the pond walls are detailed in documents released earlier this year by the <strong>TVA</strong>. The documents were requested by the <strong>Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC)</strong> in an effort to pinpoint why the pond breach occurred in the first place.</p>
<p>The documents show that the dikes making up the coal ash pond were in frequent need of maintenance and re-engineering. <strong>TVA</strong> officials made decisions based on opinions of both in-house engineers and consulting engineers. The pond’s most recent stability inspection – which showed nothing that would indicate failure – occurred just two months before the spill.</p>
<p>So far, the utility has spent more than $68 million cleaning up the mess, and that cost is expected to rise to as high as $825 million. The utility also has spent $11 million to buy out property from locals affected by the spill. Additional expenses are expected to cover litigation, penalties and settlements.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/08/engineers-raised-questions-about-coal-ash-pond-walls-decades-ago/">Engineers raised questions about coal ash pond walls decades ago</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/04/08/engineers-raised-questions-about-coal-ash-pond-walls-decades-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVA voice mail system facing possible crash</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/26/tva-voice-mail-system-facing-possible-crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/26/tva-voice-mail-system-facing-possible-crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice mails]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is facing a new round of headaches since its coal ash impoundment failed last December and dumped a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to an east Tennessee neighborhood. Now it is facing the wrath of the magistrate judge in the case, according to the Knoxville News Sentinel. U.S. [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/26/tva-voice-mail-system-facing-possible-crash/">TVA voice mail system facing possible crash</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> is facing a new round of headaches since its <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> impoundment failed last December and dumped a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> on to an east Tennessee neighborhood. Now it is facing the wrath of the magistrate judge in the case, according to the <em>Knoxville News Sentinel</em>. <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/mar/25/judge-says-voice-mail-order-clear/&lt;br &gt;&lt;/a&gt;"><span id="more-419"></span></a>U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Guyton upheld an order made by the court Jan. 30, which required the <strong>TVA</strong> to preserve all voice mails, as they could be potential evidence in the case against the utility. The <strong>TVA</strong> is being criticized because it didn’t immediately turn off its &#8220;do not delete&#8221; function on its voice mail system until February 27. Recently, it began limiting recording time on voice mail messages to 20 seconds each. Many calls are to the utility’s help line for resident affected by or who have questions about the spill.</p>
<p>And now the <strong>TVA</strong> is arguing that the process of saving the voice mails could possibly &#8220;bring down&#8221; the utility’s voice mail system. Magistrate Judge Guyton was unmoved by the <strong>TVA’s</strong> argument that keeping the past voice mails is straining its system.</p>
<p><strong>TVA</strong> says it believes it has preserved most of the voice mails related to the spill and says it doubt future voice mails will have any bearing on the pending lawsuits against the utility.</p>
<p>Magistrate Judge Guyton says he will issue a written ruling soon. An April 8 hearing has been set to determine how soon the lawsuits could be resolved or tried, according to the Knoxville News Sentinel.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/26/tva-voice-mail-system-facing-possible-crash/">TVA voice mail system facing possible crash</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/26/tva-voice-mail-system-facing-possible-crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVA pays millions to property owners affected by coal ash spill</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/25/tva-pays-millions-to-property-owners-affected-by-coal-ash-spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/25/tva-pays-millions-to-property-owners-affected-by-coal-ash-spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has paid east Tennessee home and landowners more than $9.5 million to compensate them for damages after the utility’s Kingston, Tennessee coal ash impoundment failed late last year and poured more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash sludge on to a rural community, according to the Knoxville News [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/25/tva-pays-millions-to-property-owners-affected-by-coal-ash-spill/">TVA pays millions to property owners affected by coal ash spill</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> has paid east Tennessee home and landowners more than $9.5 million to compensate them for damages after the utility’s Kingston, Tennessee <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> impoundment</strong> failed late last year and poured more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash </strong><strong>sludge</strong> on to a rural community, according to the <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/mar/24/tva-post-spill-payouts-now-95-million/">Knoxville News Sentinel</a>.<span id="more-416"></span></p>
<p>The utility reported that to date, 61 payouts were made to the owners of 40 homes and about 51 properties on 210 acres of the 300 acres affected by the spill. The homes and land acquired by the <strong>TVA</strong> generated $62,900 a year in Roane County property taxes. Roane County Property Assessor Teresa Kirkham says more parcels of land affected by the spill may be purchased by the utility.</p>
<p>The spill destroyed three homes and damaged a dozen more in the wake. Not just land, but the neighboring Emory River was affected.</p>
<p>The $1 million-a-day cleanup effort is expected to cost the <strong>TVA</strong> between $525 million and $825 million before it is complete. <strong>TVA</strong> has vowed to restore the land to its previous condition – if not better condition. However, many property owners are skeptical. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Coal ash</strong> may contain dangerous toxins such as arsenic, lead, barium, manganese and chromium which can lead to potential health problems such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Many residents in the area have complained of respiratory problems and at least one child has tested positive for heavy metal.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/25/tva-pays-millions-to-property-owners-affected-by-coal-ash-spill/">TVA pays millions to property owners affected by coal ash spill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/25/tva-pays-millions-to-property-owners-affected-by-coal-ash-spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration focuses on clean coal practices</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/16/obama-administration-focuses-on-clean-coal-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/16/obama-administration-focuses-on-clean-coal-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FutureGen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama’s new energy policies are pitting mining companies and environmentalists against each other as the federal government explores new ways of storing carbon emissions. Mining companies and the lawmakers who support them say that establishing these new measures could cost billions while environmentalists say the price is not important in comparison to the ecological [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/16/obama-administration-focuses-on-clean-coal-practices/">Obama administration focuses on clean coal practices</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-400" title="obama1" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/obama1-100x100.jpg" alt="obama1 100x100 Obama administration focuses on clean coal practices" width="100" height="100" />President</strong> <strong>Obama’s</strong> new energy policies are pitting mining companies and environmentalists against each other as the federal government explores new ways of storing carbon emissions. Mining companies and the lawmakers who support them say that establishing these new measures could cost billions while environmentalists say the price is not important in comparison to the ecological damage of continuing common practices.<span id="more-395"></span></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.kentucky.com/211/story/727280.html">Kentucky.com</a>, “The Department of Energy will soon announce whether it will use $1 billion in stimulus funds to resurrect <strong>FutureGen</strong>, a proposal to create in Illinois the world&#8217;s first coal-fired power plant designed to capture and bury carbon emissions underground.” The <strong>Bush administration</strong> decided against building the plant because it would cost more than $1.8 billion. The <strong>Government Accountability Office</strong> says that price tag is more like $1.3 billion. Proponents of “clean coal” argue that  not building that plant put the effort back a decade.</p>
<p>Renewable resources are front-and-center with lawmakers these days, after a <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA) </strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> pond failed last December, dumping more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash sludge</strong> on to an east Tennessee community. Previously unregulated by the federal government, <strong>coal ash ponds</strong> and storage units will soon have to follow standards outlined by the <strong>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)</strong> for regulating coal ash.</p>
<p>The economic stimulus plan has $3.4 billion for the coal industry, as opposed to $16.8 billion for renewable energy and efficiency programs. The <strong>Obama administration</strong> also is says it will implement a program that would cap companies’ carbon emissions.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/16/obama-administration-focuses-on-clean-coal-practices/">Obama administration focuses on clean coal practices</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/16/obama-administration-focuses-on-clean-coal-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/obama1-100x100.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/obama1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">obama1</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/obama1-100x100.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern California communities march for safer alternatives to coal-burning</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/13/southern-california-communities-march-for-safer-alternatives-to-coal-burning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/13/southern-california-communities-march-for-safer-alternatives-to-coal-burning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breathing problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dry ash storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southern California community members worried about the ill effects from coal-burning mines and power plants are conducting a 100-day national campaign uniting 100 communities in the area urging lawmakers to phase out of coal-based energy and transition to cleaner, renewable sources that would produce more green jobs, according to the Palm Springs (California) My Desert. [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/13/southern-california-communities-march-for-safer-alternatives-to-coal-burning/">Southern California communities march for safer alternatives to coal-burning</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Southern California</strong> community members worried about the ill effects from coal<strong>-burning mines and power plants</strong> are conducting a 100-day national campaign uniting 100 communities in the area urging lawmakers to phase out of <strong>coal-based energy </strong>and transition to cleaner, renewable sources that would produce more green jobs, according to the Palm Springs (California) <a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20090309/OPINION02/903090318/-1/newsfront">My Desert</a>.<span id="more-383"></span></p>
<p>As part of the campaign, protestors will march Saturday along Palm Canyon in Palm Springs and ask Congress to “<strong>quit coal and other fossil fuels</strong> and support a clean energy economy,” according to the report. “It is a major source of air and water pollution and leaves in its wake huge, <strong>toxic waste piles of ash.</strong>”</p>
<p>The protest comes two and a half months after the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> <strong>Kingston, Tennessee <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> impoundment</strong> failed, dumping 2.2 million pounds of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> on to 300 acres of property in rural east Tennessee. Coal ash contains toxins such as arsenic and lead, which contribute to serious health issues such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. Residents in the area already have reported experiencing breathing problems since the spill occurred.</p>
<p>The utility is shelling out a million dollars daily to clean up the mess, which destroyed homes and damaged property. Total cleanup costs are expected to ring in between $525 million and $825 million, according to the <strong>TVA</strong>. The utility also has vowed to convert the coal ash ponds at its Kingston plant to dry ash storage, which will take up to two years to complete.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/13/southern-california-communities-march-for-safer-alternatives-to-coal-burning/">Southern California communities march for safer alternatives to coal-burning</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/13/southern-california-communities-march-for-safer-alternatives-to-coal-burning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>4,000 gallons of coal ash pour into Potomac River</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/12/4000-gallons-of-coal-ash-pour-into-potomac-river/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/12/4000-gallons-of-coal-ash-pour-into-potomac-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash pond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emory River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NewPage Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potomac River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington lawmakers are now more in touch with the coal ash spill travesty that dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic material on to 300 acres of residential property in east Tennessee last December. Sunday night, a pipeline at a Maryland coal-burning power plant ruptured and leaked about 4,000 gallons of coal ash sludge [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/12/4000-gallons-of-coal-ash-pour-into-potomac-river/">4,000 gallons of coal ash pour into Potomac River</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington lawmakers are now more in touch with the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill</strong> travesty that dumped more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic material</strong> on to 300 acres of residential property in east <strong>Tennessee</strong> last December. Sunday night, a pipeline at a Maryland <strong>coal-burning power plant</strong> ruptured and leaked about 4,000 gallons of <strong>coal ash sludge</strong> into the <strong>Potomac River</strong>, according to the <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view/2009_03_10_4_000_gallons_of_coal_ash_sludge_spills_in_Potomac/srvc=home&amp;position=recent">Boston Herald</a>.<span id="more-380"></span></p>
<p>The spill originated from a small hole in one of <strong>NewPage Corp.’s</strong> pipelines that cross the <strong>Potomac</strong>. The leak began about 8 p.m. Sunday night and continued to leak until 6 a.m. Monday morning.</p>
<p>The <strong>spill</strong> is just a fraction of the size of the one caused when the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a></strong> impoundment pond failed and oozed <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> into a rural <strong>Tennessee</strong> neighborhood and into the nearby <strong>Emory River</strong>. But Maryland state regulators are still concerned of the potential <strong>environmental problems</strong> the leak may cause. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Coal ash</strong> could contain high concentrations of selenium, sulfate, arsenic, iron and manganese, which can contribute to <strong>serious health problems</strong> such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications. The Tennessee spill has already caused many locals to complain of respiratory problems, and a young child in the area recently tested positive for heavy metals.</p>
<p>The storage and disposal of coal ash is not currently regulated, but <strong>Environmental Protection Agency </strong>officials have vowed since the <strong>TVA</strong> spill to draft rules for coal ash storage and disposal.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/12/4000-gallons-of-coal-ash-pour-into-potomac-river/">4,000 gallons of coal ash pour into Potomac River</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/12/4000-gallons-of-coal-ash-pour-into-potomac-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration vows to propose regulations for coal ash</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/09/obama-administration-vows-to-propose-regulations-for-coal-ash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/09/obama-administration-vows-to-propose-regulations-for-coal-ash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breathing problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash ponds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal combustion waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has promised to make good on a promise it made nine years ago to issue regulations for coal ash storage. The announcement comes more than two months after a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) impoundment pond failed and dumped more than a billion gallons of toxic coal ash on to 300 [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/09/obama-administration-vows-to-propose-regulations-for-coal-ash/">Obama administration vows to propose regulations for coal ash</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-376" title="epa" src="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" alt="epa 150x150 Obama administration vows to propose regulations for coal ash" width="150" height="150" />The <strong>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)</strong> has promised to make good on a promise it made nine years ago to issue regulations for <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com"><strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a></strong></a><strong> </strong>storage. The announcement comes more than two months after a <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/tennessee-valley-authority/" title="" rel="external">Tennessee Valley Authority</a> (TVA)</strong> impoundment pond failed and dumped more than a billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> on to 300 acres of <strong>east Tennessee</strong> property, destroying homes and damaging land in its wake.<span id="more-370"></span></p>
<p>The <strong>Obama administration</strong> backed up the promise by vowing to propose new regulations governing <strong>coal combustion waste</strong> by the end of the year and acting immediately to ensure more dangerous spills do not happen again, according to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/us/politics/08ash.html?_r=1&amp;ref=politics">New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>The <strong>EPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery</strong> is deciding now whether to regulate the waste as <strong>hazardous</strong> or nonhazardous. In 2000, the material was classified as nonhazardous, but because of better pollution controls, the ash has become more dangerous. <strong>Coal ash</strong> contains toxins such as arsenic, lead, chromium, manganese and barium. Those materials can lead to serious health problems such as cancer, liver damage and neurological complications.</p>
<p>Residents who live hear the <strong>Kingston, Tennessee</strong> plant have already complained of breathing problems and some have even tested positive for high levels heavy metal.</p>
<p><strong>TVA</strong> is undergoing a million-dollar-a-day cleanup program that is expected to total between $525 million and $825 before it is restored.</p>
<p>The <strong>coal industry</strong> has long opposed regulation, saying the move will cost billions each year. Activist groups say regulation is necessary to ensure the safety of those living near the plants. <strong>EPA</strong> has raised concerns from improved tests that show more toxins than previously thought leaching from the ash into groundwater, according to the report.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/09/obama-administration-vows-to-propose-regulations-for-coal-ash/">Obama administration vows to propose regulations for coal ash</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/03/09/obama-administration-vows-to-propose-regulations-for-coal-ash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">epa</media:title>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/03/epa-150x150.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early TVA memo indicates effort to minimize coal ash disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston Fossil Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Valley Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A memo that apparently passed through the hands of several folks at the TVA drafting &#8220;talking points&#8221; about the Kingston Fossil Plant coal ash spill of Dec. 22 appears to attempt to minimize the significance of the disaster, according to a report today from the Associated Press. The memo was apparently sent to the AP [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/">Early TVA memo indicates effort to minimize coal ash disaster</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A memo that apparently passed through the hands of several folks at the <strong>TVA</strong> drafting &#8220;talking points&#8221; about the <strong>Kingston Fossil Plant</strong> <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> spill of Dec. 22 appears to attempt to minimize the significance of the disaster, according to a report today from the <a href="http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MjUwMTYxNg== ">Associated Press</a>.</p>
<p>The memo was apparently sent to the AP by accident, according to their report. They say the memo shows additions and deletions that change more alarming language to tone down the sense of urgency and threat resulting from the <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a>.</p>
<p>An example cited by the AP story says the word &#8220;catastrophic&#8221; was changed to &#8220;sudden, accidental release&#8221; when describing the spill that flooded more than 300 acres surrounding the energy production plant with toxic coal ash sludge.</p>
<p>While environmentalists are pointing to the memo as evidence that TVA is trying to cover up the seriousness of the situation, TVA representatives say that they were simply trying to present accurate information as they understood it at the beginning of the crisis, the AP reports. As the situation developed, the TVA says it modified its information to upgrade the severity of the situation, the report states.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/">Early TVA memo indicates effort to minimize coal ash disaster</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/23/early-tva-memo-indicates-effort-to-minimize-coal-ash-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ash ponds at two Birmingham coal facilities top list for arsenic</title>
		<link>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wendi Lewis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ash spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Integrity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orlando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic coal ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report published today by the Birmingham News says the coal ash retaining ponds at two Birmingham-area coal-fired energy plants contain the highest levels of arsenic in the country, ranked and Nos. 2 and 3 on a list compiled by the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP). The study evaluates the amount of ash deposited in on-site [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/">Ash ponds at two Birmingham coal facilities top list for arsenic</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report published today by the <a href="http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/statebriefs.ssf?/base/news/123140611354130.xml&amp;coll=2&amp;thispage=1">Birmingham News</a> says the <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/tag/coal-ash/" title="" rel="external">coal ash</a> retaining ponds</strong> at two Birmingham-area coal-fired energy plants contain the <strong>highest levels of arsenic </strong>in the country, ranked and Nos. 2 and 3 on a list compiled by the <a href="http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/">Environmental Integrity Project (EIP)</a>. The study evaluates the amount of ash deposited in on-site ash ponds and landfills from 2000-2006, according to the News report.<span id="more-97"></span></p>
<p>The EIP released the report, titled &#8220;<strong>Disaster in Waiting</strong>: Toxic Coal Ash Disposal in Impoundments at Power Plants&#8221; yesterday. The report says U.S. Environmental Protection Agency data shows power plants are disposing of high volumes of <strong>toxic metals</strong> in open lagoons.</p>
<p>There is a lot of attention on this issue now, following a December 22, 2008 disaster when the retaining wall at a coal-fired electric plant in Kingston, Tennessee, failed, dumping more than 1 billion gallons of <strong>toxic coal ash</strong> and other waste over 300 acres in East Tennessee. The event is being called the worst <strong>environmental disaster</strong> since the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p>
<p>But the Tennessee disaster is just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to its official report, which listed Birmingham-area facilities Gaston Steam Plant in Shelby County and Gorgas Steam Plant in Walker County at No. 2 and 3, the EIP issued a press release stating that other <strong>toxic coal pollution dumps</strong> around the United States pose a <strong>greater potential danger</strong> than the Tennessee <strong><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/" title="" rel="external">coal ash spill</a></strong> disaster site.</p>
<p>According to the release, at least 13 states have three or more under-regulated &#8220;wet dumps&#8221; on the &#8220;Worst Of&#8221; list for <strong>toxic chemicals</strong>. One coal pollution dump in Orlando, Fla., is reported to have TEN TIMES more arsenic than the Tennesee disaster site.</p>
<p>The release says the Tennessee facility was found on five of the six <strong>toxic chemical</strong> lists for the 50 worst coal-fired power plant pollution &#8220;wet dumps.&#8221;</p>
<p>EIP evaluations were based on industry-reported data collected by the EPA Toxic Reporting Inventory (TRI) data system for 2000-2006. EIP looked at the presence of arsenic, chromium, lead, nickel, selenium and thallium in the waste at Tennessee-style <strong>pollution dumping sites</strong> across the nation.</p>
<p>Eric Schaeffer, director of the Environmental Integrity Project, says, &#8220;The Tennessee eco-disaster has cast a spotlight on what is a very serious national problem &#8211; the existence of under-regulated <strong>toxic pollution coal dump sites</strong> near coal-fired pwoer plants that pose a serious threat to drinking water supplies, rivers and streams.&#8221; He said the Tennessee disaster is a warning sign of more trouble to come.</p>
<p>The EIP is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for more effective enforcement of environmental laws. Read the full news release and official report:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/eip-news-release1.pdf">EIP News Release</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/media/2009/01/eip-report-disaster-in-waiting1.pdf">EIP Report: Disaster in Waiting</a></p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com">Coal Ash Spill</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/">Ash ponds at two Birmingham coal facilities top list for arsenic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coal-ash-spill.com/news/2009/01/08/ash-ponds-at-two-birmingham-coal-facilities-top-list-for-arsenic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

